Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush widens probe of intelligence flaws (Iraq, WMD)
Boston Globe ^ | Farah Stockman and Bryan Bender

Posted on 02/03/2004 1:14:59 AM PST by FairOpinion

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:11:30 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON -- The White House announced yesterday that its inquiry into intelligence failures would include Libya, North Korea, and Iran in addition to Iraq, sparking quick criticism that the panel will be a long-delayed and watered-down examination of the intelligence that the Bush administration cited to justify the war in Iraq.


(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: bush43; churchcommittee; daschle; iran; iranianwmd; iranwmd; iraq; iraqiwmd; iraqwmd; joelieberman; josephilieberman; korea; libya; libyanwmd; libyawmd; lieberman; nancypelosi; nk; nkorea; nkoreanwmd; nkwmd; northkorea; pelosi; saddam; tomdaschle; wmd; wmdintel; wmdinvestigation
Bush is doing the right thing.

The Dems are demonstrating that they couldn't care less about the intelligence, they just want to "get Bush".

"One of the major questions that needs to be addressed is whether senior administration officials, including members of the Cabinet and senior White House officials misled Congress and the public about the nature of the threat from Iraq," said a letter to Bush signed by five lawmakers. The lawmakers included Senator Tom Daschle of South Dakota, Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, and Representative Nancy Pelosi of California.

I didn't know about this letter that Daschle, Lieberman and Pelosi signed -- but so much for my slight sympathy for Lieberman.

"

1 posted on 02/03/2004 1:15:00 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
A Rat is a Rat is a Rat.

Never forget.
2 posted on 02/03/2004 1:34:01 AM PST by Stallone (I am pleased to see that ALL the enemies of freedom aren't running for the Rat nominee for president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stallone
I've watched President Bush's filmed discussions on this matter and noticed that he looks very shifty-eyed and excessively slow of speech as if spinning yarn as he goes. You know he knows very well what facts he has and I don't buy that slow speech stuff. I would like to know if there are professional people out there to evaluate the truth of such publicized speeches.
I voted for both he and George Bush Sr.
3 posted on 02/03/2004 4:32:56 AM PST by LK12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Even Bush's choice of the Warren Commission as a model drew criticism yesterday.

Why should it? Are we just going to open up the hearings and share with terrorists the same sort of intelligence the CIA, FBI and NSA deal with on a daily basis? This nation's security is at risk, and the WOT would essentially be shot to hell in a hurry.

Even if it was closed. Jerks like Patrick Leahy would be leaking vital and sensitive information to the media. The same media the terrorists watch.

4 posted on 02/03/2004 4:36:29 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (All Our Base Are Belong To Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LK12
It looks like he plans to "appoint" the panel himself. Nobody but the most biased partisans will accept that, we just as well forget about it and save the money.

Imteresting that Blair is making noise about doing the same. Both governments formed OSP type groups in the last couple years to bypass the normal intel groups, both seem to want to make sure no investigation goes there.

I think they'll throw Tenet to the wolves and call it "solved". Probably the only reason they kept him around.

5 posted on 02/03/2004 5:18:50 AM PST by steve50 ("There is Tranquility in Ignorance, but Servitude is its Partner.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
"I just spoke to the staff of 30 senior Democrats and none of their staff have been consulted on this panel,"

A good sign that this commission has a chance to actually be fair.

6 posted on 02/03/2004 5:21:38 AM PST by alnick (A vote for anyone but George W. Bush for president in 2004 is a vote to strengthen Al Qaeda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alnick
"I just spoke to the staff of 30 senior Democrats and none of their staff have been consulted on this panel,"
A good sign that this commission has a chance to actually be fair.

No, it makes it all the more likely that the investigation will "appear" to be biased & a whitewash. The defendent in a trial doesn't & shouldn't pick the judge, jury & prosecutor.
7 posted on 02/03/2004 5:31:54 AM PST by familyofman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
It's strange how responsibilty is usually given to the leader, if something goes wrong (no WMD, after vigorous claims to the contrary), EXCEPT when it comes to President Bush and the Republicans who support him. Then it becomes "pass the blame" to someone else.
8 posted on 02/03/2004 5:38:22 AM PST by Merdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyofman
The president isn't the defendant in this "trial." The intelligence community is.
9 posted on 02/03/2004 6:41:14 AM PST by alnick (A vote for anyone but George W. Bush for president in 2004 is a vote to strengthen Al Qaeda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: alnick
The president isn't the defendant in this "trial." The intelligence community is.

That is exactly right. The dims are treating this as if all the intelligence problems are Pres. Bush's fault -- nothing could be farther from the truth. The problem is lack of human intelligence assets on the ground, that started with the Church committee back in the late 70s.

Then the intelligence community were restrained, by congress, to hire choir boys as assets -- which obviously had shortcomings -- these restrictions came into play in the 80s and 90s. Hardly the time frame that Pres. Bush was in office.

So Pres. Bush comes along and experiences the results of the long standing policy failures and wants to fix it. Meanwhile the dims and Congress had all this time to "correct" the policy failures they imposed, have done nothing. For them to sanctimoniously cry about the structure of the commission is like the fox protesting about not guarding the hen house. It is Pres. Bush's problem to fix and he should have every right to choose the method of getting to the bottom of the problems and fixing them. I'd say: "Damn the dim's torpedoes, full speed ahead!"

10 posted on 02/03/2004 7:06:51 AM PST by FranklinsTower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LK12
I voted for Bill Clinton three times.

Hillary Clinton was my mother.

But now, I am a Republican...
11 posted on 02/05/2004 6:55:40 AM PST by Stallone (I am pleased to see that ALL the enemies of freedom aren't running for the Rat nominee for president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson