Not only do they offend our sensibilities, they also insult our intelligence.
1 posted on
02/04/2004 12:42:15 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
"internal investigation" my arse. These peeps must really think Americans are dumb - oh wait - check out their audience. Sigh.
2 posted on
02/04/2004 12:52:14 AM PST by
Fenris6
To: kattracks
The article title is hilarious, if thought about in a certain way. {:>)
3 posted on
02/04/2004 12:53:49 AM PST by
DeepDish
(This space for rent.)
To: kattracks
Punk'd. Hmmmm. I remember my daddy calling my brother on the carpet for using the word "punk". We didn't know the real meaning. Now executives use it and it's the name of a TV show. My how things have changed. Someday a boob will just be a boob .......
and a teat will just be a teat.
To: kattracks
In the old days of television, anything that even approached this type of an incident would have resulted in a cut to a commercial and a ban/blacklist in the industry for the entertainer who pulled the stunt ("you'll never work in this town again").
10 posted on
02/04/2004 1:12:01 AM PST by
weegee
To: kattracks
CBS will not do the right thing by banning these two clowns because there would be a Hollyweird boycott of the event in solidarity under the guise of protecting the 1st Amendment. Principle sold down the river.
13 posted on
02/04/2004 1:19:30 AM PST by
Young Rhino
(http://www.artofdivorce.com)
To: kattracks
Not only do they offend our sensibilities, they also insult our intelligence.
BTTT
To: kattracks
Seems to me that Janet ought to show up at the grammy's wearing the same outfit, just so she can demonstrate what she thought was going to happen.
16 posted on
02/04/2004 2:25:48 AM PST by
Brad C.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson