Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Japan just can't switch to gold - yet
The Business Times (Singapore) ^ | February 3, 2004 | Anthony Rowley

Posted on 02/04/2004 9:11:45 AM PST by Cicero

OPINION
Published February 3, 2004
Japan just can't switch to gold - yet

By ANTHONY ROWLEY

WHETHER a studied statement, an off-the cuff comment or a veiled threat, Japanese Finance Minister Sadakazu Tanigaki's suggestion last week that Japan could diversify part of its huge foreign exchange reserves into gold has had international reverberations.

It has brought home once more the fact that the vast dollar reserves which Japan and the rest of Asia hold are a Sword of Damocles for the dollar and the US Treasury market. The impact of such a move on the dollar would be severe. And as Japan has a third of total US Treasury securities held outside the US, the impact on the bond market would also be severe.

Mr Tanigaki's statement (in answer to a question in Parliament) that he felt it necessary to take a view on the future composition of Japan's foreign exchange reserves (the bulk of which are in dollars), and that this might include a review of gold holdings, comes at a time when other Asian nations have been expressing concern about their vulnerability to the dollar. It also occurs when Asian central banks (the People's Bank of China for one, an informed source told BT) are expressing strong interest in gold.

Asian monetary authorities are working too on laying the foundations for an Asian Bond Market which would provide the infrastructure through which the region could reduce its dependence on the dollar and the US Treasury market, and provide a means for the region to deploy its own savings without channelling them offshore.




Mr Tanigaki's comments were thus timely even if, as a senior Japanese Ministry of Finance official claimed to this correspondent, it would be wrong to infer any immediate action on Japan's part. There is, in fact, a powerful argument why Japan cannot move out of dollars for the time being. This is because it needs to buy dollars, rather than sell them, so long as it pursues its current policy of also buying economic recovery through exports. The MOF spent a record 20 trillion yen (S$321 billion) last year in propping up the dollar against the yen and in the first month of 2004 alone it has spent an incredible seven trillion yen more.

The dollars it acquires are then invested back into securities of the dangerously indebted US government. This is an absurd situation, rather like a shopkeeper lending ever larger amounts of money to an important customer who is also a profligate spender, so that he can maintain consumption. The customer signs ever-increasing amounts of IOUs or bills and the shopkeeper has decreasing faith in these. But he cannot sell them so long as he retains his dependence on keeping the customer happy. It is a delicate and dangerous balancing act, and one might wonder why a Japanese finance minister should risk upsetting it, as Mr Tanigaki did.

It may have been pure naivety. But it would be dangerous to bank on it. This is not the first time that Japan has issued veiled threats to the US that it is capable of retaliating if the exchange rate weapon is deployed (as Treasury Secretary John Snow appears to be doing now through his policy of benign neglect for the dollar).

There was an occasion in 1996 when former Japanese prime minister Ryutaro Hashimoto pondered out loud during a visit to New York about what might happen if Japan were to reduce its (even then) large holdings of US dollar securities. Washington appeared to get the message and the severe upward pressure that the yen had been subjected to eased off. Mr Tanigaki, according to some schools of thought, may have been issuing a similar veiled threat ahead of this week's G7 finance ministers' meeting in Florida.

Alternatively, the minister may have been floating a trial balloon to see what impact it would have on the gold, foreign exchange and US Treasury bond markets. As it happened, very little, even though as UBS commented, Mr Tanigaki's remarks may be the biggest story in the official gold sector for many years. The dollar paid more attention to hints by the US Federal Reserve that it could raise interest rates sooner rather than later. The Treasury bond market also seemed too preoccupied with domestic events to notice the remarks.

The fact is, however, that at some time the threat of Asian governments running down their colossal dollar holdings (which constitute the bulk of the US$1.9 trillion of official foreign exchange reserves held in Asia) is going to crystallise. It could happen if Japan's economy is moving, as some economists suggest, beyond total export dependence towards a broader-based domestic recovery. Or it could happen if rising US interest rates stall growth and demand for imports. But happen it surely will and reshaping the dangerous structure of mutual dependence between East Asia and the US should be top of the agenda for the G7.

The writer is BT's Tokyo correspondent



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; Japan
KEYWORDS: balance; debt; gold; payments; trade
Gold is in a primary bull market, but at the moment, IMHO, is in an intermediate pullback, so gold and most gold and silver stocks probably won't resume their uptrend for several months. But this article points to some of the dangers hanging over our economy. When they will break, who knows?

The third major player in this economic struggle, Europe, also has a stake in the dollar/yen relationship, and recent news stories suggest that the Euroswine are leaning hard on Japan for interfering with the dollar/Euro exchange rate.

1 posted on 02/04/2004 9:11:46 AM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cicero; AdamSelene235; Starwind
Ping
2 posted on 02/04/2004 9:14:54 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
gold ping
3 posted on 02/04/2004 9:37:36 AM PST by snopercod (When the people are ready, a master will appear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Gold is in a primary bull market...

Thus far I agree...;^)

Trading in and out of a primary bull market is the chief reason that there are no customers' yachts.

IMHO.

4 posted on 02/04/2004 11:34:43 AM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
do they own and control us or vice versa-perhaps we have become such a large debtor to the asian bankers we are TOO BIG TO LET FAIL
5 posted on 02/04/2004 11:55:35 AM PST by y2k_free_radical (ESSE QUAM VIDERA-to be rather than to seem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod; Minuteman23
(A belated) thanks for the ping, John. A very interesting article, with sad implications.

Just arrived home from an overnight trip to Philadelphia, and no real contact with news or the internet (sometimes little ‘inconveniences’ can actually turn out to be favors in disguise. It’s amazing how much peace of mind one can enjoy during a time of temporary ignorance of the world’s shenanigans .... :)

I just now read the official communiqué issued at the conclusion of the G7 meeting today. I interpret their ‘will allow more flexibility' [for the US$] phrase as an agreement to allow the dollar’s exchange value to continue to decline, and at least a verbal commitment not to offset its decline with (anyone’s -- US, French, British, Canadian, German, Japanese, Italian) government intervention.

Man, are we selling our souls to the devil. So that we can continue to enjoy the good life without earning that privilege, and without concerning ourselves with the unpleasant responsibility of paying for it.

We are performing all manner of economic (although they really bear no resemblance to the laws of pure economics) gymnastics for two insidious purposes: to make it appear as though we are not (1) spending ourselves into oblivion, and (2) losing meaningful (to the survival of a free society) jobs/manufacturing hand over fist.

We are using semantics in order to cook the books regarding our employment situation (with economic magic tricks like coining new terms such as ‘exhaustees’ to describe the hundreds of thousands of people who are no longer a part of the unemployment equation because they have exhausted their unemployment compensation and are still without work. How many of us are aware that the number of ‘exhaustees’ is currently at a thirty-year high – and that, over the next six months, it is projected that two million more Americans will join those sad ranks?

These millions of people (as well as recent high school and college graduates who have yet to find work) are no longer counted among the unemployed. They have been declared statistically invisible so as to allow our leadership to perpetuate the myth of economic recovery. When I took Probability and Statistics, as I recall, the more pertinent variables one left out of the calculations, the less reliable the result. I wonder if government jobs/employment statisticians missed that particular class?

(Do you remember Barry McGuire’s ‘Eve of Destruction’? Every time I read a news release exalting the continuing economic recovery, that dang song begins running through my head – with slightly altered words, but an eerily similar connotation.)

We are also allowing our monetary system to disintegrate before our eyes so as to mask our obscene (im)balance of trade and national debt.

I am sure I sound like a broken record (feel free to turn me off at any time :), but I cannot comprehend how rational Americans do not realize that these acts of fiscal prestidigitation cannot continue forever.

There will come a day when foreign investors, who for the first time in our history own the bulk of our dollar reserves/treasuries, decide that they are no longer going to gamble on the paper of a nation that exhibits no fiscal restraint, and no genuine interest in retaining, let alone increasing, its industrial base.

This G7 meeting simply verified that we have our economic neck neatly placed in the guillotine chopping block and nations that don’t give a damn about our physical or economic security are the only ones who have access to the rope. That our ‘leaders’ could have allowed (even prescribed) us to find ourselves in this position is unconscionable.

I suspect that gold (copper/silver) will rally strongly this week – and, with the inevitable pullbacks, for the foreseeable future.

Investment-wise, I have never felt queasy about the nature of the stocks or tangibles that I invest in. But lately my portfolio has become so defensive that I almost feel guilty about seeking to profit (or at least retain my savings) from what I see as impending (over the next few months or years) economic and geopolitical catastrophe. In the past, I used to have my portfolio diversified among twelve or fifteen stocks. Today I have the bulk of my portfolio in physical gold and silver, gold and copper miners, a manufacturer of rapid deployment chemical/biological shelters and decontamination systems, a mine/HAZMAT/public safety equipment company, and an oil and natural gas company. Nothing else. I don’t trust anything else. Not now. And not for the foreseeable future.

Time to stop rambling (it appears that I set a record tonight) and start running .... :) <= at least give me partial upbeat credit for that, okay?

~ joanie

P.S. Your Ayn Rand quote on the ‘No to Judaization of Jerusalem’ thread is exquisite. We are indeed allowing capitalism (and the natural actions of a free market/adherence to the law of supply and demand/fiscal responsibility that it requires to flourish) to perish by silent default.

6 posted on 02/07/2004 5:40:47 PM PST by joanie-f (If Einstein was such a genius about gravity, why did his hair always look like that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
Joanie, as always, your observations are right on the money. My investments are a lot like yours right now, except that I have a few electric utilities, a bank, and one drug company. I'd appreciate a little more info on your holdings (your have FR mail).

Snow said that we favor a stronger dollar in today's G7 announcement, but everything else that came out of those meetings said that we're still going to let it slide indefinitely. Talk about talking out of both sides of your mouth.

It was amazing that the disappointing jobs report and disappointing earnings reports and the Moscow subway terrorism happened on Friday and the markets still went up. Talk about irrational exuberance!

Steve
7 posted on 02/07/2004 9:23:00 PM PST by Minuteman23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f
From the G-7 announcement;

For the United States, Snow gave credit to a new round of tax cuts that President Bush pushed through Congress last summer, which Snow said had helped put the United States "on a path to sustained economic growth."

You don't seem to believe Bush or Snow. I don't either. Bush has also pledged to cut the deficit in half over the next 5 years, and then writes a budget that increases this year's deficit to 520 billion. He thinks we're all imbeciles. He's mostly right.

8 posted on 02/07/2004 9:59:57 PM PST by aodell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson