[Willie Green]

It basically describes a belief that government should use force to acheive what it conciders "balance" between two consenting parties who do not desire government intervention.

Not at all. Through the very act of incorporation, Government extends investors the economic advantage of limited personal liability for the financial obligations of the artificial corporate entity that is created. In a system of checks and balances, it is also necessary to extend the same right of organization to individual employees, thus bringing some semblance of parity of economic leverage to contract negotiations.

2) Do you support government set prices?

Not at all.

[Protagoras]

Through the very act of incorporation

Sorry, nice try at injecting corporations, I said consenting parties.

thus bringing some semblance of parity of economic leverage to contract negotiations.

So creating "parity" through force is the rightful role of government?

2) Do you support government set prices? Not at all.

So you oppose the federal Reserve. And oppose usury laws. And you support uniform tariffs on all goods from all countries?