Skip to comments.
CNN/Wolf: Do you think your state should follow Mass lead on same-sex marriage?
CNN ^
| 2/4/2004
| Wolf Blitzer
Posted on 02/04/2004 2:31:25 PM PST by sonofatpatcher2
QUESTION OF THE DAY Do you think your state should follow Massachusetts' lead on same-sex marriage?
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: culturewar; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; onlinepoll; prisoners; samesexmarriage; slipperyslope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Well, I just voted and it is 60% NO...
To: sonofatpatcher2
2
posted on
02/04/2004 2:33:13 PM PST
by
MinuteGal
(Register now for "FReeps Ahoy 3". Fun and fellowship with freepers from across the U.S.A !)
To: sonofatpatcher2
Hell no!!!
3
posted on
02/04/2004 2:33:18 PM PST
by
El Conservador
("No blood for oil!"... Then don't drive, you moron!!!)
To: El Conservador
Re:
Hell no!!! Sorry, they just offer plain old "No."
4
posted on
02/04/2004 2:35:08 PM PST
by
sonofatpatcher2
(Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
To: sonofatpatcher2
Do you think your state should follow Massachusetts' lead on same-sex marriage?
Yes 40% 51482 votes
No 60% 76312 votes
Total: 127794 votes
5
posted on
02/04/2004 2:39:10 PM PST
by
goodnesswins
(If you're Voting Dem/Constitution Party/Libertarian/Not - I guess it's easier than using your brain.)
To: sonofatpatcher2
Well if there is a President Kerry this will be nationwide get ready
6
posted on
02/04/2004 2:39:34 PM PST
by
DM1
To: All
BTW, why would any regular viewer of CNN ever vote for W or for keeping marriage between a man and a woman?
All those polls and liberal slanted news reporting on CNN is just them preach to their choir. I'm not worried about W getting beat by John eFing Kerry because of CNN's reporting.
If the nation went by CNN's intent, Algore would be running for his second term, Saddam would still be killing his own folks and Osama Ben would have nuked us several times over...
7
posted on
02/04/2004 2:40:47 PM PST
by
sonofatpatcher2
(Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
To: sonofatpatcher2
no than you.
8
posted on
02/04/2004 2:41:08 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(.50 cal border fence)
To: El Conservador; sonofatpatcher2
Re: "Hell no!"
Since we're talking about Massachusetts, the home of John F'in Kerry, I thought that the appropriate response was "F... No!" However, that choice wasn't available so I just voted "no."
How is it that 40% of the people who voted could possibly want this in their states? We're not talking about small numbers - this is many tens of thousands of people. Its sick out there, and getting sicker....
To: sonofatpatcher2
If all the states have to accept Massachusetts' interpretation of marriage, why can't we all accept Vermont's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment?
To: goodnesswins
Yes 40% 52248 votes
No 60% 77316 votes
Total: 129564 votes
11
posted on
02/04/2004 2:43:13 PM PST
by
weegee
To: cripplecreek
12
posted on
02/04/2004 2:43:17 PM PST
by
sonofatpatcher2
(Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
To: Ancesthntr
We're not talking about small numbers - this is many tens of thousands of people. Its sick out there, and getting sicker.... That's what I was thinking too. But this was a CNN poll . . .
To: macrahanish #1
Re:
If all the states have to accept Massachusetts' interpretation of marriage, why can't we all accept Vermont's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment? Excellent point!
14
posted on
02/04/2004 2:44:40 PM PST
by
sonofatpatcher2
(Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
To: Ancesthntr
There are many who bump Wolf's polls. Check them every day and you will generally see a liberal tilt in the results; this result is actually surprising considering his normal respondants.
15
posted on
02/04/2004 2:45:17 PM PST
by
weegee
To: weegee
The internet version of Pinball. Bump the machine until it tilts.
16
posted on
02/04/2004 2:47:46 PM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(All Our Base Are Belong To Dubya)
To: sonofatpatcher2
voted - still 60/40
To: sonofatpatcher2
Bump, still 60% no.
18
posted on
02/04/2004 2:51:06 PM PST
by
jimt
To: sonofatpatcher2
Yeah gee golly.......youbetcha. I think it'd be just swell.
Next, I want to see marriages between men and sheep legally sanctioned. The services must include the line "There will never be another ewe."
To: AMDG&BVMH
voted - still 60/40Just wait. The anti- side of the traditional definition of marriage question has proven to be very adept at running up the online polls in their direction.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson