Replies

Most people seem to believe that the recent comments by Terry McAuliffe and John Kerry on President Bush's service in the National Guard are a full-bore attack designed to underscore Kerry's hero status, sow seeds of disrespect against the President and feed "red meat" to the Howard Dean "antiwar/anti-Bush" clique. I choose to take both men at their words in this matter. They are clearly firing "warning shots" at the President's political advisors. The Democrats are desperately afraid that Kerry's anti-American, anti-Vietnam veteran words and deeds, many recorded on film and on audio and video tape, will see the light of day in this campaign. In his misspent, post-Vietnam youth Kerry was remarkably vocal about his opposition to "American Imperialism", and never missed a chance to get in front of a microphone or camera. Of course there are also his Senate votes to weaken our military and intelligence services. The "truth is out there", and it would make great grist for the campaign advertising mill, if the Bush people don't let Kerry and the Democrats intimidate them into ignoring the "downside" of Kerry's not-so heroic or patriotic activities.

President Bush does not get intimidated. Ask Osama and Saddam. McAullife, Kerry, and the Clintons better accept that fact.

W does not call people names, he acts.

Interesting!!

So you are saying it is a pre-emptive strike to get Vietnam *off* the table?

hmmmm. Check this out:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1074196/posts