Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justshutupandtakeit
Your analysis seems about right in most points. The question is why the hell would the President take a chance on pissing off a fair number of his voter base to uphold what is an obviously flawed and worthless piece of Clintonoid legislation? Certainly, Pres Bush doesn't need to pander to those who will vote for Feinstein (and her ilk) no matter what.

I grant that all politicians (including Pres Bush) will take the easy way of political expediency especially if there were legitimate polls that indicated that a large majority of people were behind the AW ban (or other unconstitutional laws; we have seen that over and over again). But until the media (with the help of some lunatic perpetrating a major massacre) whips up an hysterical frenzy over this, the Republican Congressional Leadership should understand that they have a lot more to possibly lose if they send along a permanent extension of this law. Several studies have been commissioned concerning the effects of the 94 AW ban, one from the Clinton administration DOJ itself. The conclusion has been that this ban has had no measurable positive effect on the incidence of gun crimes.

How much political capitol do the Repubos think they are going to get from making this worthless law permanent? It can be renewed only at their detriment. The real truth about this whole business, is that the media is somehow behind the entire thing; that they want to push this to front stage to scare the already squeamish repubos into thinking that little old ladies will demand their heads for "bowing to the likes of the NRA". I think the entire notion that the President is "in trouble" with his core supporters is just so much BS invented by the media, the propaganda arm of the DNC.

132 posted on 02/09/2004 2:38:15 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: 45Auto
It appears fairly clear that Bush's strategy is to avoid domestic confrontations while concentrating on confronting our foreign enemies. It is not my ideal strategy but, as you have probably noted, I am confrontational.

There appears almost no chance this law will ever get out of the House much less reach his desk. I think it is stupid but nothing worth removing Bush over in such perilous times.
134 posted on 02/09/2004 2:44:02 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson