I never accused you of being fearful, so you're arguing a point I haven't raised.
However, it doesn't take much brain power to understand that defeating Bush is the dream of our most deadly enemies internally and externally. Nor does it take an Einstein to figure out that any RAT put in his place would remove far more of our rights protected by the 2d amendment than Bush would. Since this is so obviously true I have doubts about what those spouting off like lunatics on this issue REALLY intend. It could not be protecting the RtKaBAs since their tactics and strategy are SO absurd. They lead to total defeat for the positions claimed by their advocates.
Again, you're being needlessly insulting.
Simply by nature of the fact that he would take away FEWER of my rights than his possible Democrat replacement does not mean I march in Triumph of the Will lockstep with every stroke of the President's pen. I oppose him on his immigration, spending, campaign finance reform, medicare giveaway and firearms policies, and have made that fact clear to my Republican US Senators and Representative, as well as to the White House message center. Although I disagree with his divergence from conservatism, I will vote for him again in November, the insults of the koolaid drinkers notwithstanding.
As to my screen name, look in a dictionary under "irony."
There can be no irony without a kernel of truth.