To: ought-six
That analogy fails since one can survive a few cuts maybe even 50 or 75 but NOT the one fatal cut.
This law could be extended and later revoked. It would not be revoked EVER under a RAT president.
Those turning against Bush would ensure the second option.
This is what I am fighting against.
140 posted on
02/09/2004 2:51:30 PM PST by
justshutupandtakeit
(America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
To: justshutupandtakeit
This law could be extended and later revoked.I predicted that this would eventually be the defense.
146 posted on
02/09/2004 3:01:55 PM PST by
Lazamataz
(I know exactly what opinion I am permitted to have, and I am zealous -- nay, vociferous -- in it!!!)
To: justshutupandtakeit
"That analogy fails since one can survive a few cuts maybe even 50 or 75 but NOT the one fatal cut."
(sigh) The analogy does not fail, since you seem to have ignored my qualifier that the hundred cuts results in death, just as one fatal slash does. I am not talking about annoying little scratches that allow one to survive. Your screen name says everything about you: You are a kool-aid drinker.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson