Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PR firms praise Janet's breast stunt
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, February 10, 2004

Posted on 02/10/2004 1:59:13 AM PST by JohnHuang2

OBSCENE ON TV!
PR firms praise
Janet's breast stunt

Marketers now wonder how
they can top Super exposure


Posted: February 10, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern


© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

While millions of television viewers remain aghast at Janet Jackson's unexpected breast exposure during the Super Bowl halftime show, some ad agencies are trying to figure out how to top the stunt.

The Jackson episode was "extremely successful," says one executive, according to Advertising Age, the industry magazine.

"We love stunts at our agency, and she opened the door for more people to take risks," said James LaForce, partner in the New York public relations agency LaForce & Stevens, according to the periodical.

"It raises the bar for all of us," he added.

The reputations of CBS and the National Football League have taken a beating, but most in the PR field think Janet Jackson, as a "product" in her own right, came out just fine, Advertising Age says.

LaForce thinks few will forget the incident, which upstaged an exciting football game and the commercials, which have become a Super Bowl institution.

In the four days following the event, Jackson received twice as many mentions in the press as the commercials, according to the Washington D.C.-based research firm CARMA International.

What's more, only weeks ahead of her first album release in three years, Jackson broke the all-time search engine record. One of her singles was released Feb. 2, the day after the Super Bowl, reported Advertising Age, citing janet-jackson.com.

Jackson also will star as singer Lena Horne in an upcoming ABC special and is planning a world tour, the industry magazine said.

"It is the ultimate stunt. I don't see any downside for her," said Andy Morris, principal at the New York PR firm Andy Morris & Co., according to Ad Age. "It fits perfectly with the new CD that's about sex."

At least one firm is asking, however, whether such a stunt can backfire.

"It has absolutely changed a lot of things about how we do stunts," said Howard Rubenstein, president of Rubenstein & Associates. "Right now we are asking ourselves: Can it backfire in any way? Can anyone be injured, will it insult anyone, does it make fun of people with a defect, is it over the edge sexually? Now PR people will have to be very cautious."

Rubenstein, once a representative for Michael Jackson, is urging his staff to be cautious, fearing the possibility of being barred by the media.

Janet Jackson did not show up for an originally scheduled performance at the Grammy's Sunday night.

Peter Himler, managing director at Burson-Marsteller, thinks pulling off such stunts is shortsighted.

"So many firms are about creating short-term PR or publicity or buzz and forget that the best way to build your brand is to produce a quality product," he said, according to Ad Age.

One PR executive said the stunt came off as a desperate act, leaving the public feeling manipulated.




TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fcc; homosexualagenda; publicindecency; publicnudity; stunt; superbowl
Tuesday, February 10, 2004

Quote of the Day by Milligan

1 posted on 02/10/2004 1:59:13 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
UGH
2 posted on 02/10/2004 2:04:00 AM PST by GeronL (www.ArmorforCongress.com ............... Support a FReeper for Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
It wasn't a very attractive boob, either.
3 posted on 02/10/2004 2:33:03 AM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"We love stunts at our agency, and she opened the door for more people to take risks," said James LaForce, partner in the New York public relations agency LaForce & Stevens, according to the periodical. "It raises the bar for all of us," he added.

This guy is an idiot. Did he not hear the outcry of disgust over this stunt? Did he not see all the columnists complaining about not just the halftime show, but the tacky commercials? Did he not watch the Grammys, and how toned-down it was compared to the Super Bowl? Did he not hear about all the complaints McDonald's received about their corporate pitchman Justin Timberlake? Did he not hear about ER cutting out a scene which exposed an elderly woman's breast?

The last thing any corporation or network is going to want to do right now is to do something even more offensive than Janet's stunt. I hope this clown' current and potential clients here about what this guy thinks is "raising the bar"!

4 posted on 02/10/2004 2:51:54 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
It was a lousy stunt. So we know that Janet Jackson has a new album now. Buh-bye, Janet.

She got booted off the Grammy Awards for refusing to apologize on the show for her Super Bowl stunt. Justin Timerlake did apologize and some entertainment industry wanks called him a sellout for doing so. I don't see it that way (but then a FReeper has been arguing with me on a Moby thread for my calling Moby a sellout for selling all 18 cuts from a recent album for tv commercial jingles). But I digress...

Locally (Houston) I saw an interview with the jewelry store that sold Janet's entourage the big pierce sun thing. I recognize the guy who was interviewed (but I don't know him personally) but did not get the name of the store or the manafacturer of the jewelry so even they didn't get enough of the right kind of publicity (the kind that would send customers to their door).

The streaker was a better bit of publicity since he had a web address painted on his back. He's being prosecuted by the HPD for tresspassing. I think that the firm who paid him to streak and promote their website should also be cited for conspiracy in the offense.

5 posted on 02/10/2004 3:13:17 AM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"It raises the bar for all of us," he added.

Using the traditional sense of "raising the bar," I'd seriously have to disagree. This person's psychological profile would probably be very interesting reading. He must be referring to a different bar.

Sounds like a "dumbie!" (Can't find "dumbie" thread...I must be a dumbie, too!)
6 posted on 02/10/2004 3:31:46 AM PST by hummingbird ("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/553341/posts

How Have We Become a Nation of Dumbies?
7 posted on 02/10/2004 3:36:24 AM PST by hummingbird ("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird
How Have We Become a Nation of Dumbies?

maybe just going through a bad spell.

8 posted on 02/10/2004 7:04:46 AM PST by Oztrich Boy (It is always tempting to impute unlikely virtues to the cute)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
...could be, Oztrich Boy, could be...

<8^)
9 posted on 02/11/2004 7:34:56 PM PST by hummingbird ("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson