To: JohnHuang2
and the mass judge has taken homosexual unions off the table, it is homosexual marriage or nothing for the left.
To: JohnHuang2
O.K. then. Let them "marry" each other. Then tax them to hell and back for engaging in a practice that has been determined to be dangerous to society. ( Like they do to us who smoke.)
4 posted on
02/10/2004 6:01:48 AM PST by
zygoat
To: JohnHuang2
The homosexuals want to get married, and the heterosexuals just want to live together. Something's wrong with this picture.
To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Double Bagger Alert.
I hope with all my heart that this type of crap backfires in these homo-promoters' faces. I hope and pray that more Americans wake up to the truth of the homosexual agenda. And we can help - if each person who understands this basic fact - that same sex acts are unhealthy, unnatural, and immoral - just communicates this to a few people, who then get clear in the brain about it, and by understanding the truth, become stronger in heart themselves, and then THEY do the same thing - just think what could happen.
More later.
6 posted on
02/10/2004 7:35:46 AM PST by
little jeremiah
(everyone is entitled to their opinion, but everyone isn't entitled to be right.)
To: JohnHuang2
...legalizing same-sex marriage.What about legalizing marriages among larger groups? Who gave these folks the right to restrict anyone to only marrying in twos? And what about getting rid of restrictions regarding relatives from marrying? Who are they to enforce their morals on anyone else? And what about marrying other species?
If they want to redefine the meaning, let's just go ahead and make it meaningless!
7 posted on
02/10/2004 8:42:37 AM PST by
FormerLib
(We'll fight the good fight until the very end!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson