[Antoninus]

The idea that ANYONE considers the viewing of internet pornography to be an appropriate use of library computers is simply mind-boggling to me.

Yet that, apparently, is the ALA's position, is it not? "No, no, no, we can't forbid a vagrant from his allotted 1/2 hour of free porn at the library--that would be censorship."

We are becoming a nation of politically correct sissy-boys.

[New Perspective]

The idea that ANYONE considers the viewing of internet pornography to be an appropriate use of library computers is simply mind-boggling to me.

I agree with you 100%. As far as free porn in libraries and that we do not have a say it that? Bulls&^t. Anyone who has a phone should check your bill. Notice anything under taxes and extra fees? There is a small charge there for internet funding for schools and libraries. Since we pay for the internet, I believe we have a say in what is shown and in what type of atmosphere.

This is just another example of liberals making everyone pay for their disgusting freedom of speech for their ilk.

[ought-six]

I hardly think you can draw an association between First Amendment protections and being a "sissy-boy." I happen to detest rap "music," but I don't want it banned by governmental edict, because there is, my friend a slippery slope: Tomorrow they might want to ban the Bible. It's happened before in history. Don't think it can't happen here. Tyranny is always lurking just below the surface, waiting patiently for its day in the sun.