Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calling Major Ritter
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37043 ^ | D. Hackworth

Posted on 02/10/2004 8:19:43 AM PST by rmgb

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: rmgb
Johnny Cash Hackworthless & Ritter make a great team!

Maybe Worthless can get Ritter to find him a 13 yr old date off the internet. That is what Ritter does best, huh?

21 posted on 02/10/2004 8:40:12 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmgb
WND has turned down a strange road. Sperry's 'Bush Lied' article and this one may be two of many.
22 posted on 02/10/2004 8:43:04 AM PST by chichipow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmgb
Col Hackworth ignores discussion of the falling dominoes because Bush & Blair didn't back down over Iraq...Khadafy would still be building his bomb, Khan in Pakistan would still be operating his mail-order bomb business, Assad would be sleeping more easily, the base in Qatar might not be established & the troop withdrawals from Saudi might not be happening (and more barracks there being bombed), al Qaeda might be operating unfettered out of Baghdad, and the Good Guys wouldn't have a landing strip in Iraq to keep the heat turned up on Iran, Libya, Syria.... The entire Mediterranean would have soon been a boiling cauldron; no ships would have been safe and North Korea would still have all those good customers in the ME. Who wants to predict the price of gasoline in ten years under that scenario?
23 posted on 02/10/2004 8:45:45 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
Tamsey, you are correct. The figure reported is $400K. I don't know where I came up with the 750 figure.
24 posted on 02/10/2004 8:47:23 AM PST by kellynla ("C" 1/5 1st Mar. Div. U.S.M.C. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: elli1
Amen!
25 posted on 02/10/2004 8:48:57 AM PST by kellynla ("C" 1/5 1st Mar. Div. U.S.M.C. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
I'm not sure where you got your figure but I wouldn't be surprised if that number WAS mentioned.

He has been collecting lumps of money for years all pertaining to his advocating for Saddam (the book he wrote, speaking fees, etc)...... what you saw probably just added a few things together.
26 posted on 02/10/2004 8:52:35 AM PST by Tamzee (EARTH FIRST!!! We'll stripmine the other planets later...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Hackworth is an American patriot with unimpeachable credentials. I would side with him before siding with Cheney, who had better things to do than serving in the military.
27 posted on 02/10/2004 8:53:56 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chichipow
WND was deleted from my favorite links 6 months ago. Hackworth has said nothing intelligble for 3 years. He was breathing heavy for Wesley recently after in years past calling him a perfumed general. Don't be suprised when you see Hack supporting Hanoi Kerry.
28 posted on 02/10/2004 9:00:43 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
Again, the only question you need to answer is; are we better off today with Saddam out of power than we were a year ago when Saddam was in power? We all know Saddam "had" WMD in the past, had used them on Iran and on his own people. So whether they ever find the WMD, I'll sleep better tonight and ad infinitum with Saddam out of power.
29 posted on 02/10/2004 9:01:02 AM PST by kellynla ("C" 1/5 1st Mar. Div. U.S.M.C. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rmgb
WMD; how about the tons of high (and low) explosives that keep blowing up and killing people?? they were not found and i bet there are tons more laying around. i will also bet there are tons of WMDs hiding in Iraq. no, they are not in the places where they should be. suggest looking for them in spider holes made for WMDs.
30 posted on 02/10/2004 9:12:16 AM PST by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camas
Remember, they only recently found a huge cache of Nazi weapons including fully armed and fueled airplanes from World War II in Germany and chemical weapons from the Japanese in China. WMD are easily hidden and probably would not be found in a regular depot.
31 posted on 02/10/2004 9:17:21 AM PST by JMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Hang it up Hackworth

It was SARCASM. I believe Ritter like I believe Shiite don't stink.

32 posted on 02/10/2004 9:17:43 AM PST by demlosers (SUVs=Haliburton=Bush=Religion=Flag=VRWC=Repubs =WMDs= Oil=Black Helicopters=We're all going to die!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
Cheney has more integrity in his little toe than Hackworth has these days. Being a good warrior does not bestow wisdom on an individual. Think George McGovern, Scott Ritter, Charlie Rangel, John Kerry.
33 posted on 02/10/2004 9:17:59 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
Scotty gt the money from that Iraqi, but where's the movie he was supposed to make???
34 posted on 02/10/2004 9:19:39 AM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tamsey
There was also a memo found in Iraq authorizing agents to offer gold jewelry to Ritter, presumably for his wife. But to be fair it didn't say if he accepted, it was just an authorization for their intel people.

They should have tried offering him a lifetime supply of candy or Burger King gift certificates.

35 posted on 02/10/2004 9:22:01 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: chichipow
Sperry lost ALL credibility when he SWORE he would tell some story about Clinton....but didn't.
36 posted on 02/10/2004 9:22:03 AM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rmgb
Things You Have to Believe to Think that Iraq Has No WMD at post #46

And I'm not even getting into the really heavy stuff there. I could go on...

37 posted on 02/10/2004 9:25:36 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123
Hackworth had unimpeachable credentials but took a leftist turn somewhere along the way. Just like Ritter.
38 posted on 02/10/2004 9:25:58 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (Proud member of the right wing extremist Neanderthals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rmgb
Isn't it amazing how a poor, humble, pedophile can work hard and finally make something out of him self in America?

The news media must be proud.

39 posted on 02/10/2004 9:27:53 AM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

And if Saddam did not have the WMD and the means to produce them on very short notice why would he refuse to reveal them or lack of rather than have his country invaded and himself removed.

No question that Saddam had the capability to produce bio/chem weapons but here's my thinking as to why stockpiles haven't been found--Saddam couldn't afford the chance that the weapons would be used against him/ his regime. He wasn't the most popular guy in Iraq and coups/ coup attempts are a fact of life. Not that SH would have been all that concerned if a Baath party convention had been annihilated, but he would have been concerned about the damage to his aura of ''invincibility'' w/in Iraq. Which leads me to the second point--The bio/ chem weapons were a means of controlling the Iraqi populace; the citizens of Iraq had to believe that Saddam had these methods of intimidation/ control & he could not afford for Iraqis to believe, even erronously, that he did not have those weapons. And finally, in Saddam's mind, it was imperative for his neighbors to believe that he had these weapons, most especially because Iraq's defense capabilities were considerably degraded post Desert Storm. The biggest potential threat to Saddam in the region was from Iran but Saddam had used bio/ chem weapons against Iran in the Iran/ Iraq war--a fact that would seriously hamper military recruitment/ retainment efforts in Iran. In short, the so-called WMD's, in truth or myth, were too powerful & too necessary a psychological weapon for Saddam to relinquish.

40 posted on 02/10/2004 9:28:29 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson