To: gdyniawitawa
Humm. I'm running Win98SE on this office computer, but I guess I'll have to visit Windows Update when I get home. It wasn't there this morning.
Updating once a month was a crazy idea. I hope MS will reconsider it. The updates should be posted if, as, and when they are ready. If SysAdmins want to update once a month, let them. But the rest of us would rather not have such an artificial constraint imposed on us, I would imagine.
2 posted on
02/10/2004 2:59:53 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: gdyniawitawa
I've downloaded and installed the lastest patches to be on the safe side. However, I haven't been compromised by a virus or trojan horse cause I practice safe computing and have anti-virus and firewall software installed on my PC.
3 posted on
02/10/2004 3:02:44 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: gdyniawitawa; All
To: gdyniawitawa
I don't let my PC anywhere near the web anymore. I routed my previous email account to my .mac account. I ONLY surf through my mac. No viruses.
5 posted on
02/10/2004 3:14:45 PM PST by
mercy
To: gdyniawitawa
"Flagship Windows operating system." What a joke. Its one leaky, rusty, slow, ugly flagship! Macintosh rules.
6 posted on
02/10/2004 4:06:26 PM PST by
Astronaut
To: gdyniawitawa
11 posted on
02/10/2004 4:18:37 PM PST by
Truth666
To: gdyniawitawa
13 posted on
02/10/2004 5:07:42 PM PST by
B Knotts
(Deport Arnold! <-(shamelessly ripped off from dangus))
To: gdyniawitawa
It will be hard for me to ever trust Microsoft again after downloading a virus fix and got a back door virus from their site. I will and have an automatic virus program that updates automatically since that time and will not go near any Microsoft site for anything. I'll buy their programs but I will not visit their site and download anything from them.
14 posted on
02/10/2004 5:18:18 PM PST by
AIC
To: gdyniawitawa
This is what happens when there is no competition. Microsoft was allowed to use questionable tactics to gain monopoly status and we wonder why their quality is non-existant?
15 posted on
02/10/2004 5:19:04 PM PST by
NCjim
To: Axiom Nine
ping
41 posted on
02/10/2004 11:49:18 PM PST by
pax_et_bonum
(Always finish what you st)
To: gdyniawitawa
Oh - enough with the hatchet job and hyper language. MS issues "Critical" updates as they need to and have them ready. I am notified of them and I download it. 30 seconds. This is not new, complicated or unexpected.
To: gdyniawitawa
I have been using PC's since I was in elementary school, and I have never had a virus. On top of that, Windows XP has been an excellent operating system in almost all regards. I have never been hacked, or compromised in any way.
The vast majority of Windows users are non-technical. Nearly everyone who uses Linux or some Unix variant is extremely technical. Its not surprising that people who run those operating systems take good care of their systems and do simple things to protect themselves.
If you somehow suddenly shifted all current Windows users onto Linux, the problems would follow them onto the new platform. Whoever has the dominate market share is going to experience most of the problems.
60 posted on
02/11/2004 3:43:37 PM PST by
ryanjb2
To: gdyniawitawa
Does this mean I shouldn't upgrade from Win 3.1??
To: gdyniawitawa
67 posted on
02/11/2004 7:34:45 PM PST by
scab4faa
(Can't sleep.. the clowns will eat me... Can't sleep.. the clowns will eat me... Can't sleep..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson