To: DTA
Let's not pretend the SAS fought like they were BiH. They primarily just stood around and reported back to Sarajevo UN HQ or London as to what was going on. It's not like the UK/USA/NATO bombed the Serbs around the clock.
If the UK/SAS wanted to help Muslims kill more affectively, as you claim, then they didn't do much in support. The Muslims had chronic arms shortages throughout the war and, if I'm not mistaken, Gorazde was one of the three towns in Eastern Bosnia full of refugees driven out from elsewhere - land the Muslims never reclaimed. The SAS was active around Screbrenica as well, and we both know who won there!
The few SAS-directed airstrikes in 94-95 were meant to simply hold the Serb advance at bay - not to help the Muslims turn the tide. If helping the Muslims were the goal then a few AT-4 rockets, artillary pieces and more ammo would have seen the numerically superior Muslims break out of the UN safe areas and drive the Serbs back to the Drina. But it never happened.
Trust me, DTA: If the US/UK wanted to help Muslims kill Serbs they'd have done more than just launch a few airstrikes on their behalf.
25 posted on
02/12/2004 1:31:39 PM PST by
JCB
To: JCB
26 posted on
02/12/2004 1:54:46 PM PST by
joan
To: JCB
The few SAS-directed airstrikes in 94-95 The damage to Bosnian Serb infrastructure caused by NATO/British/US bombing was great, and many Serb civilians were killed. Depleted uranium was used as well - especially in a Sarajevo suburb called Hadzici.
27 posted on
02/12/2004 1:57:18 PM PST by
joan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson