If science were to adopt the "design hypothesis" as a methodology, what reason would there be to continue looking for the missing evolutionary path, since the answer already lies in an unknowable "designer"? To forgo the search for such answers, merely because of the failure of the imagination of a Dembski or a Behe, would be a tragedy."When you get to a mystery, stop! Publish! You're done."
I can't imagine ID ever teaching us a thing, and I get no good answers on how it is ever supposed to.
The answer is in all those peer-reviewed ID science journals. You know, that great body of scientific literature that somehow doesn't exist. Talk about gaps!