Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Elsie
It would seem like ALL creatures should be literally COVERED with all kinds of INEFFECTUAL 'features' then!!

The more complex the organism, the more often you find features that have little to no survivability benefit - right down to the DNA.

I bet if you took a few moments of thought, you could come up with a couple examples in your own body. Not everything in an organism is there for a specific purpose, sometimes things are just left over from earlier development.

Now, if we go to your ludicrous extreme of "literally covered with all kinds of INEFFECTUAL 'features,'" guess what happens. The sheer mass would then become limiting for survival and thus a pressure for elimination. But if there is no pressure for elimination, features tend to hang around for a long, long time.

62 posted on 02/13/2004 9:30:50 AM PST by Ophiucus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Ophiucus
Now, if we go to your ludicrous extreme of "literally covered with all kinds of INEFFECTUAL 'features,'"
 
Oh?? Why is it ludicrous?? Why is it extreme??
 
 
I guess you'd have to have some data to base that assumption upon...
 
like, in each generation, what is the rate of changes to non-changes...
and, once you have THIS data, what are the...
 
   a. percent of 'survival enhancing changes'...
   b. percent of 'survival neutral changes'...
   c. percent of 'survival reducing changes'...
 
...do you??

94 posted on 02/13/2004 11:12:01 AM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson