Skip to comments.
Scientists Develop New Hydrogen Reactor
Akron Beacon Journal ^
| 2/13/04
| GREGG AAMOT
Posted on 02/13/2004 7:32:20 AM PST by ZGuy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: The_Victor
"The media thinks they are a peer review."
You misunderstood. The media thinks they are a QUEER review.
21
posted on
02/13/2004 8:04:11 AM PST
by
Lee'sGhost
(Crom!)
To: The_Victor
All the obstacles of ethanol production come into play. For a substitute to liquid hydrocarbons, why take it to another step?
Although, the real good part, that I see, is possible easy/efficient conversion of extraterrestrial alcohols into hydrogen fuels. Who says the mars objective won't bring tech benefits to the future of China? ;)
To: ZGuy; *tech_index
Thanks for posting this!
23
posted on
02/13/2004 8:06:38 AM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
To: ZGuy; camle; The_Victor
"...too good to be true...""...How much energy is required to produce the ethanol?..." My best guess is that they use some sort of electrolysis setup to break the ethanol down and then collect the hydrogen. If this is true then you would need some power source generating electricity to drive this step............a coal-fired or nuclear power plant, anyone?
Horror of horrors, you'd be back to unacceptable (to the Greenies) technology.
24
posted on
02/13/2004 8:12:43 AM PST
by
DoctorMichael
(Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
I concluded all my beer to Methane conversion testing about two years ago.
To: Petronski
Fine, where do we get the ethanol, and at what cost?Your daddy's still. Then you be rid of big oil and big electricity. But watch out for the Revenuers.
26
posted on
02/13/2004 8:18:58 AM PST
by
frithguild
("W" is the Black Ice President - underestimated until the left completely loses traction.)
To: Jack of all Trades
Is water vapor a bad thing?
Are we living on Dune, now?
27
posted on
02/13/2004 8:19:17 AM PST
by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: ZGuy
The cell could produce 1 kilowatt of power, nearly enough for an average home. I don't think so. I did a little assessment of the electric usage of my (rural) house, with the thought of installing a generator, and the peak figure (what it actually has to be able to put out if you don't want brownouts) came out considerably higher than that.
28
posted on
02/13/2004 8:21:09 AM PST
by
Eala
(Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
To: The_Victor
Probably more BTUs go in to cooking corn than the BTUs coming out as ethanol. The rank of the fuel used should be considered, however...
To: The_Victor
Not just the ethanol, but an article about this from yesterday mentioned a catylist. You don't just pick catylists up off the ground, they have to be produced also, especially if you intend to have any consistency at all in your reactions.
30
posted on
02/13/2004 8:24:59 AM PST
by
American_Centurion
(Daisy-cutters trump a wiretap anytime - Nicole Gelinas)
To: frithguild
My daddy didn't have a still. We always got our shine from them crazy Duke boys!
31
posted on
02/13/2004 8:25:04 AM PST
by
Petronski
(John Kerry looks like . . . like . . . weakness.)
To: The_Victor
How much energy is required to produce the ethanol? I'm guessing this is still an energy sink, not an energy source
And what are the waste products produced? Co2, Co, ?????
32
posted on
02/13/2004 8:28:22 AM PST
by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: Eric in the Ozarks
Probably more BTUs go in to cooking corn than the BTUs coming out as ethanol.My daddy's still uses a solar collector!
33
posted on
02/13/2004 8:28:56 AM PST
by
frithguild
("W" is the Black Ice President - underestimated until the left completely loses traction.)
To: camle
This is a chemical reactor. It processes ethanol into hydrogen. It also probably requires some outside power, but if it is cleverly designed, not too much.
34
posted on
02/13/2004 8:29:15 AM PST
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Is that one a hydrogen sulfide converter? I made one too. way cool, but having a hard time patenting it, and research costs are killing me.
35
posted on
02/13/2004 8:30:49 AM PST
by
Fierce Allegiance
(My life consists of bulldozers, racing, beer & my 5 beautiful women. Not bad, I say!)
To: Diogenesis
Not at all. I merely pointed out a glaring error in the article.
To: ZGuy
"The Minnesota researchers envision people buying ethanol to power the small fuel cell in their basements." ...in additon to wearing rags and munching on fruits, nuts and lots of fiber. BTW, water is the most prevalent and potent greenhouse gas and they also left out the CO2 it takes to produce the alcohol. 1KW will power a computer, or TV and a few light bulbs, that's it.
37
posted on
02/13/2004 8:35:11 AM PST
by
spunkets
To: ZGuy
Where are you going to get the ethanol from? How much energy do you have to spend to get ethanol? This question is very important. If it is going to be net negative energy gain, then it is foolish to do. For example you can take water and use electricity to decompose it to hydrogen and oxygen. The amount of hydrogen produced from this process (electrolysis) is less than the electric energy used. Hence, unless the electricity used cost you nothing, then this process is net loss. If we followed the French in standardizing nuclear power plants, we could be now sitting pretty, with practically free electricity. We complicated that industry so much, and allowed a failed high school science politicians, and journalists to create fear in our population.
To: Diogenesis
"Is water vapor a bad thing?"Water vapor is a greenhouse gas. It and condensed droplets have the significant effect when compared to the total of all the others. The greens leave that fact out, because it hinders their propaganda efforts to bring us all back to the stone age on ghia.
39
posted on
02/13/2004 8:43:58 AM PST
by
spunkets
To: Eala
`Daily' Graph (5 Minute Average)
http://www.bolhuijo.com/electric/
40
posted on
02/13/2004 8:49:40 AM PST
by
kanawa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson