To: ZGuy
something sounds too good to be true here. I remember pons & fleichman's cold fusion breakthrough.
has this been peer reviewed? published in a scientific journal? has anybopdy duplicated the research?
if not then there's a good chance it's PR generating bunk.
2 posted on
02/13/2004 7:36:54 AM PST by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
To: camle
The media thinks they are a peer review.
3 posted on
02/13/2004 7:41:24 AM PST by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(I may grow old but I will never grow up:) 64 going on 19)
To: camle
If it promises to be a very lucrative technology, publishing it in a journal and exposing it to peer review aren't the best first steps. If they've got it they've got it and the market will prove it to the world. They ought to be well advanced in the patent process before getting any publicity.
To: camle
Next step coming: make the ethanol from hemp...
6 posted on
02/13/2004 7:42:27 AM PST by
JimRed
(Disinformation is the leftist's and enemy's friend; consider the source before believing.)
Here is the link to the article from today's issue of the journal Science :
Renewable Hydrogen from Ethanol (Free registration is required to access the article)
8 posted on
02/13/2004 7:46:02 AM PST by
ZGuy
To: camle
9 posted on
02/13/2004 7:46:11 AM PST by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: camle
Yes...I'm a bit chary of bold claims like this without any scientific criticism.
17 posted on
02/13/2004 7:59:04 AM PST by
tcuoohjohn
(Follow The Money)
To: camle
This is a chemical reactor. It processes ethanol into hydrogen. It also probably requires some outside power, but if it is cleverly designed, not too much.
34 posted on
02/13/2004 8:29:15 AM PST by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson