Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

American Airlines CEO apologizes for pilot's comments on Christianity
Dallas Morning News ^ | 2/13/2004

Posted on 02/13/2004 11:08:18 AM PST by sinkspur

FORT WORTH - The chief executive of American Airlines has apologized after a pilot suggested that non-Christian passengers on a recent flight discuss the faith with Christians.

Gerard Arpey said the airline has grounded the pilot with pay while executives investigate the incident.

Arpey said he apologized to anyone who was offended by the pilot's comments on a flight from Los Angeles to New York.

"Let me assure you that we take this very seriously and are conducting a thorough investigation," Arpey wrote in a letter to Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, an advocacy group that monitors anti-Semitism. He said American Airlines "promotes an environment of respect for the diversity of all persons, regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, disability, gender, age or sexual orientation."

Foxman had written to Arpey that religious belief is a personal matter and the pilot had breached the privacy of passengers. He called the pilot's conduct "deeply troubling."

The airline said the Washington-based pilot asked passengers on the Feb. 7 flight to raise their hands if they were Christian. Speaking over the aircraft public-address system, he then suggested that other passengers use the flight time to talk to the Christians about their faith, an airline spokesman said.

An airline spokesman, Tim Wagner, said American was interviewing crew members and passengers who complained about the comments. The airline has also asked the pilots' union about the incident. Wagner declined to say whether American would disclose its final findings.

The pilot did not respond to an e-mail request for an interview.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: aa; americanairlines; apology; celebratediversity; spiritualjourney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Servant of the 9
I don't think that tape was legit. It was probably an Imus put-on.
21 posted on 02/13/2004 12:30:03 PM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Oh, no doubt Foxman is showboating, but it was the action of the clueless pilot that allowed him to get on stage. American cannot afford a loose cannon like this.

I don't think the behavior of the pilot was usual and customary and his appreciation for the seriousness of his responsibilities when piloting the aircraft should be probed, especially since he spooked his own flight crew. Nonetheless Foxman and the ADL should not be engaged in this at all.

22 posted on 02/13/2004 12:33:22 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver
were it not for the damage it's done to Mel Gibson and his family.

Damage ? What damage other than self-inflicted wounds do you see ? Foxman/ADL have a legitimate concern with the movie, Mel's public comments, and with Hutton Gibson's published views. They have no concern in this matter and should not become involved.

23 posted on 02/13/2004 12:36:00 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Oh, no doubt Foxman is showboating, but it was the action of the clueless pilot that allowed him to get on stage.

Good point. This guy's actions were something of a written invitation for the ADL to come in on their high horse.

24 posted on 02/13/2004 1:20:19 PM PST by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
Damage ? What damage other than self-inflicted wounds do you see ? Foxman/ADL have a legitimate concern with the movie, Mel's public comments, and with Hutton Gibson's published views.

There's no doubt that Mel's father is a bit... well, I can't think of a polite way to say it, so I won't. But as far as Mel standing by his father, what else could he do? I mean, I don't agree with my father on everything--in fact, on a number of points I sharply disagree with him--but he's always been an excellent father. That's all I care about; I don't expect him to be perfect, because no one is.

And in the case of Mel's father, maybe he does have some deeply serious personal problems, but if he was a generally good father to Mel (which it seems he was), are his ridiculous beliefs good grounds for Mel to disown him?

25 posted on 02/13/2004 1:26:28 PM PST by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
You are really obessed with this story. When I see such actions from people like yourself I'm tempted to suggest you take the spec out of your own eye (church) before you mes with others.
26 posted on 02/13/2004 7:26:54 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
You are really obessed with this story.

Just tryin' to keep you informed, CBG.

You can always just not respond if you're not interested.

27 posted on 02/13/2004 7:29:10 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
There was no attack on Jews. It has nothing whatsoever to do with stopping the defamation of the Jewish people. It simply tells me that Mr. Foxman is not serving the Jewish people in this case. He has his own agenda here.

Not unlike what Abe is/was doing to Mel Gibson.

28 posted on 02/13/2004 7:29:32 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MegaSilver; sinkspur
The ADL's Christophobia would actually be quite funny, were it not for the damage it's done to Mel Gibson and his family.

Sink, you're part of the ADL, right?

29 posted on 02/13/2004 7:31:21 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
American cannot afford a loose cannon like this.

Is he any more dangerous to society than one of those Catholic priests you read about?

30 posted on 02/13/2004 7:33:26 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
Is he any more dangerous to society than one of those Catholic priests you read about?

He's damaging to American Airlines' business, which is why, I think, he'll be offered an early retirement.

31 posted on 02/13/2004 7:34:59 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
You can always just not respond if you're not interested.

No, thanks. I certainly am interested. While we may disagree on this, I'm glad you invite me over.

32 posted on 02/13/2004 7:35:53 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
Sink, you're part of the ADL, right?

No.

33 posted on 02/13/2004 7:35:57 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9
That's not what was reported by an eye witness, an editor at the Advocate, who was on the airplane.

The pilot asked the non-Christians to speak to the Christians.

Even the worst report from the complaining women on the day after the flight never mentioned "Jews."
34 posted on 02/13/2004 7:37:03 PM PST by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9
The pilot asked his brothers in Christ, who were probably all sitting in tourist class to witness to the Jews in first class.

It was way over the top.

And so is your assertion.

35 posted on 02/13/2004 7:37:10 PM PST by harrowup (So perfect I'm naturally humble)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
He's damaging to American Airlines' business, which is why, I think, he'll be offered an early retirement.

Too bad some other of society's institutions didn't have the same good sense, eh?

36 posted on 02/13/2004 7:37:25 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
Not unlike what Abe is/was doing to Mel Gibson.

No. The cases are substantively different. This case has nothing whatsover to do with antisemitism. There was no attack against Jews. The Jewish people were not persecuted, raped, murdered, and exiled because some pilot suffered from irrational exuberance. He did frighten his flight crew for which he felt remorse or shame and apologized.

37 posted on 02/14/2004 4:57:09 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
No. The cases are substantively different. This case has nothing whatsover to do with antisemitism.

But I know Abe often feels there is antisemitism when Christians are singled out or gain particular attention in the public square.

38 posted on 02/14/2004 8:38:13 PM PST by ClintonBeGone (<a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/~clintonbegone/">Hero</font></a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson