Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush's service records: The score card
Salon ^ | Feb. 13, 2004 | Eric Boehlert

Posted on 02/13/2004 8:23:23 PM PST by Bella

Bush's service records: The score card
Did the president walk out on the Texas Air National Guard 30 years ago? A guide through the morass of new evidence.

By Eric Boehlert

Feb. 13, 2004

Forty-five months after allegations first surfaced that President Bush failed to honor his obligation to the Texas Air National Guard, the story has returned with a vengeance. As aides release a trickle of selected documents in the White House's effort to persuade the public that Bush fulfilled his obligation, the story continues to fester and questions remain unanswered.

Some key facts have been established. Bush joined the Texas Air National Guard after graduating from Yale in 1968 and began pilot training. From 1970 to 1972 he flew F-102s out of Ellington Air Force Base in Houston. In the spring of 1972 he left for Alabama to work on the Senate campaign of former postmaster general Winton Blount, a friend of Bush's father. But Bush never got proper authorization to train with an Alabama unit. That did not come until the fall of 1972 when he was assigned to Dannelly Air National Guard base in Montgomery, Ala. After the 1972 election, Bush returned to Texas and reportedly served with the Houston unit, before his discharge proceeding began in the fall of 1973. But as the Boston Globe first reported in 2000, there was no proof in Bush's discharge papers that he had ever served in Alabama, or that he served from the spring of 1972 to the spring of 1973. During the summer of 1972 Bush also failed to take his required physical and was stripped of his flying status.

In the 2000 campaign, Bush's spokesman told the Associated Press that after a thorough search he could not find any documents in his military record to prove Bush ever showed up in Alabama. But this week, after Bush declared on NBC's "Meet the Press" that he would "absolutely" release all of his records, and as the press and political scrutiny intensified, that all changed.

Here are some of the key elements and players in the complicated, still unfolding mystery and how they reflect on Bush's claims.

Jan. 6, 1973, dental record
Good news for Bush: Released Wednesday night, the signed document shows Bush was present at the Dannelly Air National Guard base in Montgomery, Ala., on Jan. 6, 1973. It's the first definitive piece of evidence Bush showed up on the Alabama National Guard base. More important, if Bush was still in Alabama in January 1973, it helps explain why his commanders in Houston, when filling out his annual evaluation covering May 1972 to April 1973, wrote that "Lt. Bush has not been observed at this unit during the period of the report." Records indicate Bush served only two days in Houston during that time.

Bad news for Bush: The dental record, which places Bush in Alabama in early 1973, completely contradicts statements from Bush's aides, particularly during the 2000 campaign, that immediately following the completion of the Blount campaign in November 1972, Bush returned to Houston. Moreover, the dental exam still does not prove Bush ever performed any paid duties while in Alabama, only that he went in for free dental care on one day.

Released payroll documents
Good news for Bush: They indicate Bush attended Guard duty while in Alabama and did not take a whole unbroken year off between May 1972 and May 1973. The records show Bush was credited with serving the Guard on 14 days during that crucial stretch.

Bad news for Bush: The records suggest that during a five-month period of that year Bush failed to show for any Guard duty. Worse, there are no corroborating records generated in Alabama to confirm the payroll documents. If Bush was in Alabama and getting paid, as the records indicate, a paper trail originating with his unit in Montgomery should confirm the dates highlighted in those documents. No such records have come to light.

Released retirement-point summaries
Good news for Bush: Like the payroll records, they lay out dates in 1972-73 when Bush was credited with Guard service, including dates he says he served in Alabama.

Bad news for Bush: The documents are not signed by Bush's commanders or anyone else, but are simply a computer-generated overview of points earned. Once again, there's no paperwork from Alabama corresponding to the dates listed.

Band of brothers
Have former Texas or Alabama National Guardsmen who served with Bush stepped forward to vouch for his service between 1972 and 1973?

Good news for Bush: None have done so.

Bad news for Bush: None have done so. In 2000, when the story first broke, a group of Alabama veterans offered a $3,500 reward to any guardsmen who could help confirm Bush's whereabouts. Nobody came to collect the money. This week, the conservative Washington Times published a letter from a member of Bush's Texas National Guard unit who insisted he served alongside Bush. Bad news: He served with Bush in 1970 and 1971. Nobody questions Bush's duty during those years. It's 1972 and 1973 that stand at the center of the controversy.

Brig. Gen. William Turnipseed
Turnipseed was the commander of the 9921st Air Reserve Squadron, the National Guard unit in Montgomery that Bush was ordered to report to in the fall of 1972. In 2000, the retired officer told the Boston Globe he was "dead certain" Bush never showed up for duty.

Good news for Bush: Turnipseed's story has been changing in recent weeks, and with each subsequent media interview he seems to cut Bush more slack, even suggesting he doesn't remember whether he himself was at the base during the time in question. This week Turnipseed told the Birmingham News that Bush was under no obligation to serve in Montgomery as long as he made up the time later. "I'm fed up," he added. "People want me to give them something to bash Bush."

Bad news for Bush: Turnipseed has identified himself as a Republican and says he intends to vote for Bush in 2004, which may raise suspicions about his motivations for changing his story. Further, Turnipseed still cannot identify Bush as being present. And he's not the only officer who can't remember seeing Bush. Back in 2000, the Boston Globe reported that Turnipseed's administrative officer at the time, Kenneth Lott, also did not recall Bush showing up for duty. To date, Lott's recollection has not changed. Even if Bush did show up for duty in Montgomery in October 1972, as the documents suggest, there is still no explanation for his five-month absence from April to October 1972.

Albert Lloyd Jr.
Lloyd is the retired colonel who was the Texas Air Guard's personnel director from 1969 to 1995. In 2000 he helped the Bush campaign locate and interpret relevant military documents.

Good news for Bush: Lloyd issued a statement that was released in conjunction with the payroll document on Monday declaring that Bush had "completed his military obligation in a satisfactory manner."

Bad news for Bush: In 2000, Lloyd told the Boston Globe he admired Bush and believed he ''honestly served his country and fulfilled his commitment.'' But this week Lloyd told the Washington Post he wasn't sure if he'd vote for Bush. ""I'm not happy with him," he said.

Bush's suspension from flying
In July of 1972 Bush, a fully trained pilot, failed to take his required annual physical and was subsequently suspended from flying.

Good news for Bush: None. White House chief of communications Dan Bartlett says Bush didn't have to take a physical because, since he was temporarily transferring to Alabama to work on the Blount campaign, he was no longer flying.

Bad news for Bush: As a rule, military pilots don't take it upon themselves to decide when they're going to stop flying, or whether they want to take a required annual physical. "There is no excuse for that," retired Maj. Gen. Paul Weaver Jr. told the Boston Globe. He's the former director of the Air National Guard. "Aviators just don't miss their flight physicals." By failing to take a physical and thereby losing his flying status, Bush should have been subject to a disciplinary review, copies of which would be contained in Bush's military file. But those sorts of documents are considered private under provisions of the Privacy Act, and Bush would have to authorize their release. To date, the White House has refused to do so. Aside from the lone Alabama dental record, the White House has also refused to release Bush's military medical records.

Statement of Intent, signed when Bush joined the Texas Air National Guard

Good news for Bush: None.

Bad news for Bush: In 1968 he pledged, "I have applied for pilot training with the goal of making flying a lifetime pursuit." Instead, 22 months after the government spent nearly $1 million training him to be a pilot, Bush simply walked away from his aviating career, never flying after April 1972.

Future release of documents

Good news for Bush: He promised to release all materials, but his White House is stonewalling and refusing to allow more than a handful out. So far, nothing damaging has been released.

Bad news for Bush: Undoubtedly there are more documents.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; militaryrecord; nationalguard; tang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
There's a great photo at the site, however, I don't know how to post it :-( I'd appreciate it if someone would post the photo..Thanks!
1 posted on 02/13/2004 8:23:24 PM PST by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bella
You mean that Salon is still on the respirator?
2 posted on 02/13/2004 8:25:39 PM PST by Paul Atreides (Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Meaning??
3 posted on 02/13/2004 8:26:06 PM PST by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bella

4 posted on 02/13/2004 8:27:30 PM PST by SirChas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bella
Meaning, I'm surprised they are still around.
5 posted on 02/13/2004 8:27:35 PM PST by Paul Atreides (Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bella
What a HORRIBLE article. It's so full of holes and bias I can't imagine how there could be any more.

Note how he points out that it's bad news for Bush that Turnipseed is a Republican would vote for him (which casts doubt on his motivations), and then, immediately after, says this as BAD NEWS:

Bad news for Bush: In 2000, Lloyd told the Boston Globe he admired Bush and believed he 'honestly served his country and fulfilled his commitment.' But this week Lloyd told the Washington Post he wasn't sure if he'd vote for Bush. "I'm not happy with him," he said


So, if the source likes Bush, it's bad for Bush. If the source -doesn't- like Bush, it's bad for Bush. Which is it?

This is revolting. Pravda was more accurate and unbiased than this.

Qwinn
6 posted on 02/13/2004 8:29:13 PM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirChas
THANKS so much! :-)
7 posted on 02/13/2004 8:29:41 PM PST by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bella
Band of brothers Have former Texas or Alabama National Guardsmen who served with Bush stepped forward to vouch for his service between 1972 and 1973? Good news for Bush: None have done so.

A bold faced LIE.

8 posted on 02/13/2004 8:30:21 PM PST by ambrose ("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bella
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1076899/posts
`Very active':

Joe LeFevers, a member of the 187th in 1972, said he remembers seeing Bush in unit offices and being told that Bush was in Montgomery to work on Blount's campaign.

"I was going in the orderly room over there one day, and they said, `This is Lt. Bush,'" LeFevers said Tuesday. "They pointed him out to me ... the reason I remember it is because I associate him with Red Blount."

Red Blount's son, Winton Blount III, said Bush was the campaign's deputy manager and spent a lot of time in Birmingham and north Alabama.

"He was a very active part of that campaign," said Blount. "And as my aunt said, she hoped people would act as nice in other people's homes as he did."
9 posted on 02/13/2004 8:31:45 PM PST by ambrose ("John Kerry has blood of American soldiers on his hands" - Lt. Col. Oliver North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qwinn
This article surfaced today..Will have to check their site to see what else they have. I had to sign up for their "free pass" for a day to get the entire article.
10 posted on 02/13/2004 8:32:21 PM PST by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bella
Clinton dodged the draft. laRouche served his country though.
11 posted on 02/13/2004 8:32:56 PM PST by Lyndon LaRouche In 04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Am going to read this now.
12 posted on 02/13/2004 8:35:12 PM PST by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Qwinn
Bad news for Boehlert: FReeper Hon has documented that William Turnipseed recently gave a campaign contribution to ... John Edwards.

Now how does that jive with Boehlert's claim that Turnipseed plans to vote for Bush?

Did Boehlert even bother checking campaign contribution records? (Oh silly me for asking. Why would he check, after all, when the evidence would contradict the conclusion he so desires?)

This Salon article is worthless trash.

13 posted on 02/13/2004 8:37:07 PM PST by shhrubbery!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bella
Did the president walk out on the Texas Air National Guard 30 years ago?

Did Clinton flee the country as a draft dodger and protest with the communists? Sure did.
At least Bush volunteered for Nam and served his country with honor. Clinton was a flaming coward.
Salon praises Clinton. Ironic, isn't it?

14 posted on 02/13/2004 8:38:02 PM PST by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: Lyndon LaRouche In 04
If we're going to have a troll here, a LaRouche-ie is about as good as it gets. Now, we need a Sharpton supporter.
16 posted on 02/13/2004 8:44:16 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative ("You can dip a pecan in gold, but it's still a pecan"-- Deep Thoughts by JC Watts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
I thought everyone would like to see this article at Salon that was released today.
17 posted on 02/13/2004 8:44:16 PM PST by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: shhrubbery!
I actually was wrong about that. That was another Turnipseed.

But you're right that this article is total trash. It is hardly worth the effort to point out all the lies.

But just to name a few. Turnipseed is saying what he has always said. And he voted for Bush last time, too.

And there are now TWO eye witnesses who remember seeing Bush. Plus his dental records and pay stubs.

Salon are Bush hating bedwetters.
18 posted on 02/13/2004 8:44:17 PM PST by Hon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Motherbear
Oh yes, and sexy also :-)
19 posted on 02/13/2004 8:45:06 PM PST by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Hi. please vote for larouche for president thank you very much
20 posted on 02/13/2004 8:45:11 PM PST by Lyndon LaRouche In 04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson