Skip to comments.
California Governor Urged to Arrest Mayor of San Francisco
Agape Press ^
| 1/16/04
| Fred Jackson, Allie Martin, and Jody Brown
Posted on 02/16/2004 2:05:54 PM PST by truthandlife
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-172 last
To: BikerNYC
As noted in the article:
""Mayor Gavin not only acted in violation of the civil law, he apparently violated the criminal law as well," the letters state. "California Penal Code section 115 prohibits the knowing procurement of any false or forged instrument to be filed or recorded in any public office, making such an act a felony punishable by up to three (3) years in prison."
The documents are false because they were never created by the California legislature as official documents.
161
posted on
02/17/2004 6:24:40 PM PST
by
torchthemummy
(Great Liars Need To Have Great Memories)
To: torchthemummy
Just to add: As also cited, each infraction is a single offense and cannot be deemed concurrent offenses. Each marriage license is therefore a single felony.
162
posted on
02/17/2004 6:27:37 PM PST
by
torchthemummy
(Great Liars Need To Have Great Memories)
To: torchthemummy
But he didn't procure the documents. The same sex couples did.
To: inquest
templar:
I think it wa, maybe, six months or so ago we went through this and I DID prove it, I stated the article and section and posted the language as well.
______________________________________
Sorry, I happened to miss that thread. And since you posted the contended statement to me on this thread, I'd like it if you could now back it up.
150 -inquest-
I happened to miss that one myself..
If our boy FReepmails you the mystery 'specific constitutional authority', please share. I need the laugh.
164
posted on
02/17/2004 6:33:39 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
To: truthandlife
Total disregard for the rule of law. Yeah, man, everyone must do as they please, screw the so-called laws. What's the sense of having laws when no one is left to play the game?
Our politicians are silent on people coming into our coutry illegally. They are silent on gay marriages. They want to give illegal aliens drivers licenses. So what's to stop old Mabel who just had her driver's license revoked from driving without a license. Heck, lots of people are breaking the law and no one gives a damn. It's their personal lives and they are good people too! Mabel is a good person too. She is a citizen, pays taxes, raised lots of good children who are paying taxes, and she was really hard working too, but she failed her road test, so the state took her license away, but what the heck, laws are meant to be broken.
165
posted on
02/17/2004 6:36:17 PM PST
by
harpo11
To: tpaine
If I should become convinced (by anyone at all) that the courts have the ultimate power to say what is and is not constitutional, I'll share my reasoning with you. Beyond that, I'm not at liberty to discuss private items I may or may not receive.
166
posted on
02/17/2004 6:49:17 PM PST
by
inquest
(The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
To: inquest
If our boy FReepmails you the mysterious 'specific constitutional authority', please share.
The fate of our nation may depend on it.
164 tpaine
______________________________________
If I should become convinced (by anyone at all) that the courts have the ultimate power to say what is and is not constitutional, I'll share my reasoning with you.
Beyond that, I'm not at liberty to discuss private items I may or may not receive.
166 -inquest-
I beg of you, -- reconsider.. This is serial bidness. Lifes are at steak.
167
posted on
02/17/2004 7:07:16 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
To: tpaine
Aisle still halve two ants her "know".
168
posted on
02/17/2004 7:46:57 PM PST
by
inquest
(The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
To: inquest
That clause is for things like military coups.So we can't apply it to a Gaystapo coup!
169
posted on
02/19/2004 5:05:42 PM PST
by
reg45
To: truthandlife
Reagan would have done it.
170
posted on
02/19/2004 5:06:48 PM PST
by
ChadGore
(Viva Bush. He's EARNED a second term.)
To: bluegrass
The media's filming it, everyones discussing its merits nonchalantly, meanwhile... This mayor has been BREAKING THE LAW for days! What is going on? Does anyone in CA have a spine? Guess your were asleep on the bluegrass when Californian's took the liberal Gray Davis and hung him with a political rope. It was historic.
BTW I DO NOT want to see anymore kissing of the bride/ groom whoever is whom on TV again. God help us.
Then turn off your stupid TaaaVaaa. It'll make you go blind anyway.
171
posted on
02/19/2004 5:12:29 PM PST
by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: cupcakes
"Isn't this what the libs are so concerned about the right doing? That we will let our personal views get in the way of law?" Only when it comes to us doing what they want US to do.The law seldom applies to them, especially if it gets in the way of their agenda.
172
posted on
02/19/2004 6:47:57 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
(To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-172 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson