To: BigBobber
Apparently Lockyear was consulted prior to the mayor acting.
So does this mean that the California assault weapons ban is null and void as it is in violation of the U.S. constituiton which is the supreme law of the land.
Lockyear can not enforce it if he does not enforce the law in this case.
But knowing liberals they will pick and choose which laws they follow.
To: chuckwalla
Lockyear can't enforce ANY law if he don't do something about this one. This is outright anarchy and he's allowed it as the Attorney General of the state.
This isn't Arnold's call, this is the call of the Attorney General. I pity what will happen in that state if he doesn't take steps to enforce the law.
48 posted on
02/16/2004 4:30:42 PM PST by
McGavin999
(Evil thrives when good men do nothing!)
To: chuckwalla; yall
chuckwalla wrote:
Apparently Lockyear was consulted prior to the mayor acting.
So does this mean that the California assault weapons ban is null and void as it is in violation of the U.S. constituiton which is the supreme law of the land.
Lockyear can not enforce it if he does not enforce the law in this case.
But knowing liberals they will pick and choose which laws they follow.
______________________________________
Good point..
Put Arnold's & Lockyears feet to the fire, and watch them squirm..
93 posted on
02/16/2004 7:30:34 PM PST by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines conservatism; - not the GOP. .)
To: chuckwalla
I think the feds should come in on on this
"When three or more parties conspire to carry on an on
going criminal enterprise and/or conspiracy, it can fall under the RICCO Act. ..."
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson