To: John Beresford Tipton
Sure, everything is Bush's fault.
The point is that over the years -- the Cliton years -- and probabaly even before that, the liberals succeeded in totally emasculating the intel services, focusing on political correctness, instead of doing a job. That is the real reason they missed the signs of 9-11 coming, and even after 9-11, they were more interested in doing sensitivity training, than catching terrorists.
THIS HAS GOT TO STOP.
BUT you also can't fire everyone at the bureau. But I think the head of the FBI better do a shake up, if not, he needs to go. Same about the CIA.
20 posted on
02/16/2004 6:57:44 PM PST by
FairOpinion
(If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
To: FairOpinion
"Sure, everything is Bush's fault."
Not everything, but it is verrrrry late in the day to be blaming his predecessors for screw ups as Bush ends his term. What did Clinton have to do with firing the whistleblower??
To: FairOpinion
You can start the blame with Franklin Roosevelt who cut the first deal with the house of Saud. Then you can throw in every president since. It was a good deal for a long time. Lots to be said for cheap gas. Creates a lot of jobs and keeps the economy humming. However I think the victims of Terrorism around the world and here in our own country might argue with you.
Our controllers knew the Saudis were bankrolling the terrorists ... but they were pocketing so much money they just didn't care. The game has not changed ... thus this whistle blower gets the axe.
32 posted on
02/16/2004 7:06:29 PM PST by
mercy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson