[thoughtomator]

Every human being has fundamental rights that cannot be justly infringed. This is the founding philosophy of our republic.

Why even bother with a judiciary then, if we're all free to ignore court orders as we see fit?

The question to ask is, why even bother with a judiciary if it will not itself follow the law?

The onus needs to be on the judges to follow the law, not on citizens to surrender their inalienable rights to perpetuate the illegal usurpation of legislative power by the judiciary.

[Modernman]

Every human being has fundamental rights that cannot be justly infringed. This is the founding philosophy of our republic.

I have to ask the question again: How do you propose that we go about determining when fundamental rights have been unlawfully infringed upon? (and remember, no right, not even fundamental rights, are absolute) There needs to be a mechanism that is better than "everyone gets to decide for themselves." If you can think of any system other than an independent judiciary (which, granted, makes mistakes sometimes)which balances all of the competing factors.....