Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: COEXERJ145
With the exception of the people who saw a "streak of light" in the sky, there is ZERO proof of a missile.

There is circumstantial evidence of a coverup. There were a lot of U.S. Navy vessels in the area. And a terrorist's missile didn't have to be a man-portable missile if it was mounted on a boat. For example, the SAM-6 is a portable self-contained radar-guided system and a single missile must weigh a few hundred pounds. Not man portable but easily portable in a small powerboat (launching it would be no picnic, but these are people who don't really care about getting burned alive by rocket exhaust). It would easily take out any commercial airliner. The warhead must be several kilos of high explosive.

I think you are correct that, at the very least, an IR SAM would have taken out an engine and maybe broken a wing, but it could not have cracked open the airplane and left no opportunity to declare an emergency.

36 posted on 02/17/2004 9:20:02 PM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: eno_
Two things. 1. The radar for a SA-6 is huge, heavy and complex. It would not fight on a small powerboat. 2. Like most surface to air missiles, The SA-6 must be stationary to fire. Bobbing around on a powerboat doesn't fire.
44 posted on 02/18/2004 7:06:57 AM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson