Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Reality of Outsourcing
Townhall.com ^ | Bruce Bartlett

Posted on 02/17/2004 5:35:48 PM PST by phil_will1

Last week, Council of Economic Advisers Chairman N. Gregory Mankiw ran into a buzz saw. He committed a major gaffe, which in Washington means he spoke the truth, by defending the concept of outsourcing -- contracting with foreigners for information technology services. With a lack of job growth being the central economic issue in the country today, Mankiw's comments were assailed across the political spectrum. President Bush quickly distanced himself from his aide's remarks, House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., repudiated them, and many Democrats called for Mankiw's dismissal.

There is at least one person in Washington who knows precisely how Mankiw feels: Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan. Back in 1974, Greenspan held the same position Mankiw now holds. Shortly after his confirmation in September of that year, Greenspan participated in an economic summit. At the time, the United States was in the middle of the deepest recession of the postwar period and inflation was rising rapidly. That year, the Consumer Price Index would rise 12.3 percent.

Greenspan was asked whether the Ford administration's policies were benefiting the rich over the poor. He replied: "If you really wanted to examine who, percentage-wise, is hurt the most in their incomes, it is Wall Street brokers. I mean their incomes have gone down the most."

Needless to say, Democrats had a field day attacking Greenspan for seeming to worry more about the problems of rich Wall Street brokers than those of common people. Although he quickly apologized, many observers believe that Greenspan was permanently scarred by the incident and forever afterward became far more circumspect in his public and even private comments.

Of course, when one gets caught in one of these Washington firestorms, there really isn't much one can do except apologize, hunker down and wait for the storm to pass. That is what Mankiw is doing. Unfortunately, the result is that debate on serious issues is often short-circuited and the political establishment draws erroneous conclusions. In this case, it may conclude that the issue of outsourcing is radioactive and everyone may rush to support ill-conceived legislative fixes with harmful economic consequences.

Here is the offending statement in the Economic Report of the President that has led to calls for Mankiw's head: "One facet of increased services trade is the increased use of offshore outsourcing in which a company relocates labor-intensive service industry functions to another country. ... Whereas imported goods might arrive by ship, outsourced services are often delivered using telephone lines or the Internet. The basic economic forces behind the transactions are the same, however. When a good or service is produced more cheaply abroad, it makes more sense to import it than to make or provide it domestically."

One would have a hard time finding a reputable economist anywhere who disagrees with this analysis. No nation has ever gotten rich by forcing its citizens to pay more for domestic goods and services that could have been procured more cheaply abroad. Nations get rich by concentrating on doing the things they do best and letting others produce those things they can produce better and more cheaply. It is called the specialization of labor, and it is the foundation for economic growth. That is why even Democratic economists like Janet Yellen, Laura Tyson, Brad DeLong and Robert Reich have come to Mankiw's defense.

What is different about outsourcing and why it has aroused so much protest is that it is affecting workers who thought they were immune from international competition. Blue-collar workers in manufacturing have been suffering from outsourcing for 100 years. It is worth remembering that textile jobs in South Carolina today were originally outsourced from Massachusetts. While in the short run, the transition was painful for Massachusetts textile workers, they soon found better jobs in new industries. That is why per capita income there is and always has been far higher than that in South Carolina.

It would be grossly unfair to say that it is OK to move manufacturing wherever production is cheaper, but wrong to subject information technology services to the same competition. It is mostly because of the Internet and the fact that IT people know how to use it that they are getting attention disproportionate to their numbers. Moreover, if we hadn't just gone through a painful economic recession, most of these people probably would have already found new jobs and the problem of outsourcing would not be worth writing nasty emails about to politicians and people like me.

In any case, even if the federal government tried to stop outsourcing, it cannot. We can put quotas and tariffs on goods that cross our borders, but it is impossible to stop people from importing software and data over the Internet. The only response that is possible is to adapt, innovate and stay ahead of the curve.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: brucebartlett; outsourcing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-218 next last
To: ninenot
How many gas lines did you see in Great Britain, Germany, or Canada in the 1970s?
101 posted on 02/18/2004 8:51:18 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Sender
So out of a class of 30, you might have 2 that will excel in a global marketplace, 25 that will go on to blue collar jobs or make fries, and 3 that will forever live on the incomes of the others. I suspect that in Japan and many other countries you would have a much larger percentage that will excel and a smaller number of french friers.

Not really. India and China with 2500 million people has 20 gifted for American 2. They can replace every American worker and more.

102 posted on 02/18/2004 8:55:03 AM PST by A. Pole (The genocide of Albanians was stopped in its tracks before it began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
It's no coincidence that the greatest advances in the U.S. during and after World War II were only possible (at that early time, at least) because the U.S. was able to tap Germany's knowledge base in nuclear science, aeronautics, and rocket propulsion research.

Which was made possible by generations of government funding for science in Germany.

103 posted on 02/18/2004 8:59:12 AM PST by A. Pole (The genocide of Albanians was stopped in its tracks before it began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
Yes, but the question is whether an economy can be sustained employing environmentalists and diversity consultants. Sure, demand for those jobs exists, but you have to have an underlying tax base of productive industries so that school teachers and environmentalists can draw from that well. If an economy could magically exist in a vacuum where everyone had jobs like that, I am sure Argentina's people would all declare themselves to be environmentalists.
104 posted on 02/18/2004 9:02:19 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
For years now, in fact decades, we have been hearing the lament of jobs being shipped overseas. First it was auto factories, then sneaker factories and now IT-related work.

You would think, to hear them talk, that we'd have 50 million people living in cardboard boxes by now. But I just don't see it.

I realize that many people lost jobs but they are apparently finding new ones. And not necessarily low paid ones either. How do I know that? I just look around me. Restaurants and shopping centers are still jammed. On Friday or Saturday night, you can count on a one or two hour wait for a table at just about any restaurant in the Boston area. New, expensive cars are flying off the lots, making my car look like a junker. Houses are selling around here for $300,000 and up. If you aren't at the first Open House and you don't submit a bid close to or at the asking price, you lose out. Housing is very, very tight. Not something you'd expect to see if everybody was out of work or if everybody was working at Wal-Mart, as some would have us believe.

Can anybody explain the "disconnect" here between what I am observing and what the lamestream media and Democrats are telling us, regarding the "worst economy since the Depression"?

105 posted on 02/18/2004 9:03:16 AM PST by SamAdams76 (I do not like the new "Starbucks-style" coffee lids at Dunkin' Donuts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
People cannot live in chaos for long. Cultures, states, communites, families and children cannot prosper in chaos. Even slaves will not tolerate chaos for long. And your money and cherished "property" would be devoured by chaos.

Bumps to that. If people are looking at their future as a programmer or a doctor and seeing jobs flying to India or hospitals bringing in foreign doctors as nurses (and eventually doctors) they're going to wonder what's in it for them? The argument of "oh you'll just get the better job as for some reason Americans are smarter than everyone else" isn't flying.

Or put it this way: one man, one vote is a cruel master.
106 posted on 02/18/2004 9:03:37 AM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
But not everyone needs to be in the technology fields, in fact, a relatively small percentage of people do. Our education system produces more then enough "smart techies" to satisfy demand, all these cries from industry about needing to import more workers through H1B programs is simply because they want lower cost workers, it has nothing to do with a shortage of US college grads.

The real reduction of those Americans grads is starting now, as parents divert their kids away from engineering and pile them into law school because they see what is going on.
107 posted on 02/18/2004 9:05:58 AM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
If you back and look at the history of this country, you'll find that a person's liberty was almost directly proportional to his ability to accomplish many different things on his own.

That and access to a lot of free stuff. Free frontier, free land, free lumber, no income tax, no OSHA.

One of the serious adverse affects of the industrial revolution (in all parts of the world, not just the U.S.) is that for the first time in history we had an enormous class of "free" people who relied entirely on employment by others for their livelihoods. As a result, we now have a country in which people who don't know even the most rudimentary principles of economics are casting votes for public officials based primarily on the state of the nation's economy.

Jefferson was right. Nevertheless, the horse is out of the barn.

As someone else posted on a similar thread, this is no different than asking the electorate to vote on the best method for treating pancreatic cancer.

Yes but those voters are here, nevertheless. The are not going away and neither are they Richard Burton the Orientalist.

As a business owner, to protect your own interests, you must either take away their franchise before they vote themselves a helping of your wallet, which you can only do by force (they still have guns) or by luring them with a Patriot Act style "security in exchange for freedom" trick - having "bought" some politicians (the currently preferred tactic), OR you can give up your citizenship and move to one of the many free countries in the world, OR you can buy the mob off - either via paying huge taxes, or by getting something in exchange for paying all that money - something like work.

You can pay Americans to work for you and to not kill you at the same time.

It's blackmail. If you want to stay, pay. Otherwise leave and take your chances with China's gerontocracy.

Whachyagonnado?

108 posted on 02/18/2004 9:11:01 AM PST by Jim Cane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Jim Cane
I'll do what I've always done -- take it one day at a time, and just do my best based on whatever resources I have at my disposal.

Your post is right on target -- and it actually goes a long way toward explaining why democratic rule is very "unnatural" system of government. It eventually gives way to a more totalitarian type of rule.

109 posted on 02/18/2004 9:18:12 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: bvw
"I agree with removing Federal corp income taxes,..."

Going to a consumption tax would certainly help level the playing field with respect to the handicap that our producers operate under in many of the world's largest markets - including our own. It is unconscienable that we handicap our own producers in our own market vs their international counterparts, but thats a gripe for another thread.

Although switching to a consumption tax system would help make US labor more competitive by removing the tax burden, I don't see that as being enough to offset the huge labor cost differential. Therefore, as much as I support the need for Fundamental Tax Reform (FTR), I don't see it helping out in the area of outsourcing to any significant extent.
110 posted on 02/18/2004 9:22:01 AM PST by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
A lot of similarities of what has been/is going on here in the US.
111 posted on 02/18/2004 9:25:19 AM PST by looscnnn (Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
"You are right. Tariffs should replace income/wage/payroll tax."

As a matter of fact, a National Retail Sales Tax would operate like a tariff (at least relative to the current system)because it would raise the after-tax prices of imports. However, because US produced goods would go down in price because of the removal of the current system, they would be approximately the same after-tax.

This would accomplish what tariffs would, but would be much more defensible, since we could point out that we would be taxing imports exactly the same as domestic production.
112 posted on 02/18/2004 9:27:17 AM PST by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
democratic rule is very "unnatural" system of government. It eventually gives way to a more totalitarian type of rule.

I would disagree. The less threatened a society feels, the more likely it will go in for democracy. Democracy works best in countries that don't have an overwhelming sense of fear -- Western Europe, the US, Canada, India, Japan, Australia, New Zealand. All of these have had continuous democracy since WWII. Totalitarianism is an aberration only needed in times of war. Otherwise it eats up it's people. Like what Samuel said to the people of Israel when they wanted a King.
113 posted on 02/18/2004 9:29:06 AM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole; Alberta's Child
Alberta's Child wrote:"In order to maintain an export-based economy, the nation doing the exporting must always have a lower standard of living than its trading partners."

A. Pole wrote:"But running trade deficit does not mean that the standard of living will be higher (in the long term)."


So the answers are to trash our standard of living, the value of the dollar and/or get rid of descent paying jobs in favor of mostly low paying service jobs?
114 posted on 02/18/2004 9:33:04 AM PST by looscnnn (Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Outsourcing=Competition
"The better stuff: R&D and design remains here in the States."

Give it time, they will also be sent out of the country.
115 posted on 02/18/2004 9:35:48 AM PST by looscnnn (Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
I'm sure the bell curve is universal, but don't you think at least some other countries have a much higher percentage at the top of the curve than the graduates our public schools are turning out?
116 posted on 02/18/2004 9:39:00 AM PST by Sender ("This is the most important election in the history of the world." -DU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Can anybody explain the "disconnect" here between what I am observing and what the lamestream media and Democrats are telling us, regarding the "worst economy since the Depression"?

I can. One is reality, the other is ficion. The fiction falls into two subsets.

What you are observing is the real world.

"Worst economy" etc. was intentional fiction, written by Democrats to get votes. The people who wrote the phrase were sitting in a $800,000 house when they wrote it.

The "conservatives" on this board who think the sky is falling are a different story. They are sincere; they are extrapolating one trend into the whole field of vision. Unintentional fiction.

117 posted on 02/18/2004 9:39:55 AM PST by Taliesan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
"The less threatened a society feels, the more likely it will go in for democracy."

Some noted philosopher said something about the life cycle of a democracy and his belief that it can't last indefinitely. This was a couple of hundred years or so. His argument was that, once the lower class realizes that they can vote themselves into prosperity, the proverbial jig is up. Some say we are approaching that point, since many are suffering under the delusion that they don't pay any taxes and that, therefore, government services are free (at least to them).
118 posted on 02/18/2004 9:40:24 AM PST by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
An NRST plus a low tariff (10% and under, in addition to the NRST) would be like magic. There would once again be a demand for money to use for production. Currently there is no demand for such money, just give-aways that fuel consumption which given cost (including regulation, taxes, tariffs) structures are ONLY effective at moving that moeny offshore extremely rapidly.
119 posted on 02/18/2004 9:43:05 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
Some say we are approaching that point, since many are suffering under the delusion that they don't pay any taxes and that, therefore, government services are free (at least to them).

This delusion and lost of concept of common good affects both the poor and rich alike. But those on top should lead and give example.

120 posted on 02/18/2004 9:44:06 AM PST by A. Pole (The genocide of Albanians was stopped in its tracks before it began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-218 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson