Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Modernman
These aren't carriers like we're used to. Seems to me they won't be of much use more than 500 miles off the Chinese coast. Area and sea denial, not power projection, would appear to be their mission. On the other hand, if the steam catapult feature is indeed being added, it would indicate they do intend to operate at least a few heavy strike planes.
18 posted on 02/18/2004 1:56:51 PM PST by Filibuster_60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Filibuster_60; hchutch
And US submarine captains will take one look at the ChiCom carrier and say, "There's a Navy Cross just waiting to get pinned on."
21 posted on 02/18/2004 2:02:53 PM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Filibuster_60
These aren't carriers like we're used to. Seems to me they won't be of much use more than 500 miles off the Chinese coast. Area and sea denial, not power projection, would appear to be their mission. On the other hand, if the steam catapult feature is indeed being added, it would indicate they do intend to operate at least a few heavy strike planes.

Yes, very conveniently located to Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.

35 posted on 02/18/2004 3:19:53 PM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson