[qam1]

Did you miss this?
Evolutionary Origin of Bacterial Flagellum Through Cooption: A Critical Survey

I missed it,

Can you tell me what peer reviewed journal this piece appears in?

[Michael_Michaelangelo]

Nice analysis. At least you admitted you didn't look at it.

[Heartlander]

Well, you got me… The article I cited should be peer-reviewed.
Your post should be peer-reviewed, Miller’s article should be peer-reviewed, and Begley’s article should be in a peer-reviewed journal (unless the Wall Street Journal counts).
I will try to submit this post for peer reviewing so we might discuss it…

In the interim…
Refereed Journals: Do They Insure Quality or Enforce Orthodoxy?
-Frank J. Tipler

[Michael_Michaelangelo]

One more thing. You do know that there is an infrastructure within the scientific community that can make life difficult for certain individuals to publish papers, right? My Father-in-Law is a Chiropractor with a Ph.D. in Math and a Masters in Mechanical Engineering and English. He *still* has difficulty publishing papers. Only recently has he had success in publishing papers in some of the World's most famous pubs including the AMA Journal and Spine.

I offer this for your perusal:

Behe's Response to critics concerning peer-review

Speaking of peer-review. Who reviewed and signed-up to Miller's stuff besides PBS and a few evo's?

[realpatriot71]

More "peer-review" nonsense - read it - it either is correct or not, scientifically, I don't need a group of a-holes telling me what is and is not science. Do you? Perhaps you need some more book time then?

[cookcounty]

"Can you tell me what peer reviewed journal this piece appears in?"

"Peer" = "Evolutionist"