Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

File under: 'Omission Accomplished' (Ann Coulter exposes truth about Sen. Cleland, answers critics)
WND.com ^ | February 18, 2004 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 02/18/2004 4:21:18 PM PST by perfect stranger

Liberals are hopping mad about last week's column. Amid angry insinuations that I "lied" about Sen. Max Cleland, I was attacked on the Senate floor by Sen. Jack Reed, Molly Ivins called my column "error-ridden," and Al Hunt called it a "lie." Joe Klein said I was the reason liberals were being hysterical about George Bush's National Guard service.

I would have left it at one column, but apparently Democrats want to go another round. With their Clintonesque formulations, my detractors make it a little difficult to know what "lie" I'm supposed to be contesting, but they are clearly implying – without stating – that Cleland lost his limbs in combat.

It is simply a fact that Max Cleland was not injured by enemy fire in Vietnam. He was not in combat, he was not – as Al Hunt claimed – on a reconnaissance mission, and he was not in the battle of Khe Sanh, as many others have implied. He picked up an American grenade on a routine noncombat mission and the grenade exploded.

In Cleland's own words: "I didn't see any heroism in all that. It wasn't an act of heroism. I didn't know the grenade was live. It was an act of fate." That is why Cleland didn't win a Purple Heart, which is given to those wounded in combat. Liberals are not angry because I "lied"; they're angry because I told the truth.

I wouldn't press the point except that Democrats have deliberately "sexed up" the circumstances of Cleland's accident in the service of slandering the people of Georgia, the National Guard and George Bush. Cleland has questioned Bush's fitness for office because he served in the National Guard but did not go to Vietnam.

And yet the poignant truth of Cleland's own accident demonstrates the commitment and bravery of all members of the military who come into contact with ordnance. Cleland's injury was of the routine variety that occurs whenever young men and weapons are put in close proximity – including in the National Guard.

But it is a vastly more glorious story to claim that Cleland was injured by enemy fire rather than in a freak accident. So after Saxby Chambliss beat Cleland in the 2002 Georgia Senate race, liberals set to work developing a carefully crafted myth about Cleland's accident. Among many other examples, last November, Eric Boehlert wrote in Salon: "[D]uring the siege of Khe Sanh, Cleland lost both his legs and his right hand to a Viet Cong grenade."

Sadly for them, dozens and dozens of newspapers have already printed the truth. Liberals simply can't grasp the problem Lexis-Nexis poses to their incessant lying. They ought to stick to their specialty – hysterical overreaction. The truth is not their forte.

One of the most detailed accounts of Cleland's life was written by Jill Zuckman in a lengthy piece for the Boston Globe Sunday magazine on Aug. 3, 1997:

Finally, the battle at Khe Sanh was over. Cleland, 25 years old, and two members of his team were now ordered to set up a radio relay station at the division assembly area, 15 miles away. The three gathered antennas, radios and a generator and made the 15-minute helicopter trip east. After unloading the equipment, Cleland climbed back into the helicopter for the ride back. But at the last minute, he decided to stay and have a beer with some friends. As the helicopter was lifting off, he shouted to the pilot that he was staying behind and jumped several feet to the ground.

Cleland hunched over to avoid the whirring blades and ran. Turning to face the helicopter, he caught sight of a grenade on the ground where the chopper had perched. It must be mine, he thought, moving toward it. He reached for it with his right arm just as it exploded, slamming him back and irreparably altering his plans for a bright, shining future.

Interestingly, all news accounts told the exact same story for 30 years – including that Cleland had stopped to have beer with friends when the accident occurred (a fact that particularly irked Al Hunt).

"He told the pilot he was going to stay awhile. Maybe have a few beers with friends. ... Then Cleland looked down and saw a grenade. Where'd that come from? He walked toward it, bent down, and crossed the line between before and after." (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Dec. 5, 1999)

"[Cleland] didn't step on a land mine. He wasn't wounded in a firefight. He couldn't blame the Viet Cong or friendly fire. The Silver Star and Bronze Star medals he received only embarrassed him. He was no hero. He blew himself up." (Baltimore Sun, Oct. 24, 1999)

"Cleland was no war hero, but his sacrifice was great. ... Democratic Senate candidate Max Cleland is a victim of war, not a casualty of combat. He lost three limbs on a long-forgotten hill near Khe Sanh because of some American's mistake ..." (Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Sept. 29, 1996)

The story started to change only last year when the Democrats began citing Cleland's lost Senate seat as proof that Republicans hate war heroes. Indeed, until the myth of Republicans attacking Cleland for his lack of "patriotism" became central to the Democrats' narrative against George Bush, Cleland spoke only honorably and humbly about his accident. "How did I become a war hero?" he said to the Boston Globe reporter in 1997. "Simple. The grenade went off."

Cleland even admitted that, but for his accident, he would have "probably been some frustrated history teacher, teaching American government at some junior college." (OK, I got that wrong: I said he'd probably be a pharmacist.)

Cleland's true heroism came after the war, when he went on to build a productive life for himself. That is a story of inspiration and courage. He shouldn't let the Democrats tarnish an admirable life by "sexing up" his record in order to better attack George Bush.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; annwaswrong; maxcleland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last

1 posted on 02/18/2004 4:21:18 PM PST by perfect stranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Sadly Cleland is so desperate for redemption for his defeat that he is willingly selling his soul for a lie.
2 posted on 02/18/2004 4:26:36 PM PST by OldFriend (Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: perfect stranger
This all reminds me of Bill Clinton, who always had to put himself in the midst of some life-altering event, even if he had to make it up on the spot.
4 posted on 02/18/2004 4:30:18 PM PST by Paul Atreides (Is it really so difficult to post the entire article?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
The minimum no. of pics is three.:)
5 posted on 02/18/2004 4:31:53 PM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Just because you cause confusion every time you open your mouth, that doesn't make you intellectual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Cleland's true heroism came after the war, when he went on to build a productive life for himself.

At least she has something nice to say rather than the earlier "he drops a grenade, har de har har!" title she had for the other column.
6 posted on 02/18/2004 4:32:07 PM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper

7 posted on 02/18/2004 4:34:23 PM PST by perfect stranger ("Don't shoot I'm Che! I'm worth more to you alive than dead!" Che Guevara October 1967)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lelio
I believe she said much the same thing in her first article.
8 posted on 02/18/2004 4:34:24 PM PST by stylin_geek (Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
HooRah!

One gutsy lady. Libs/commies, hate the truth. Why do they continue to lie when some courageous people will point out the truth. I would almost suspect her life is in danger!

And Molly Ivens can eat a rock. That floosy old drunk has been in the bag for so long she wouldn't understand the truth if it spilled her bottle!
9 posted on 02/18/2004 4:35:38 PM PST by lawdude (Liberalism: A failure every time it is tried!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
There you go.:-)
10 posted on 02/18/2004 4:36:44 PM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Just because you cause confusion every time you open your mouth, that doesn't make you intellectual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lelio
There was no "har de har har", the title was "Cleland drops a political grenade". Everybody else supplied the "har de har har".
11 posted on 02/18/2004 4:39:34 PM PST by perfect stranger ("Don't shoot I'm Che! I'm worth more to you alive than dead!" Che Guevara October 1967)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
"Liberals simply can't grasp the problem Lexis-Nexis poses to their incessant lying."

Classic.
12 posted on 02/18/2004 4:40:31 PM PST by TheDon (John Kerry, self proclaimed war criminal, Democratic Presidential nominee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WinOne4TheGipper
Or to quote the Gipper, "There you go again. :-)
13 posted on 02/18/2004 4:41:42 PM PST by perfect stranger ("Don't shoot I'm Che! I'm worth more to you alive than dead!" Che Guevara October 1967)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Biggest balls I've ever seen (evidence of) on a skinny woman. One point being overlooked here is that Max Cleland is now an Ex-senator. His opinion is no more relevant than yours, mine, or any other private citizen's.
14 posted on 02/18/2004 4:43:09 PM PST by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Liberals simply can't grasp the problem Lexis-Nexis poses to their incessant lying.

FOFLOL!

15 posted on 02/18/2004 4:47:29 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
"...the poignant truth of Cleland's own accident demonstrates the commitment and bravery of all members of the military....."
16 posted on 02/18/2004 5:02:03 PM PST by chiller (JUDGES is JOB #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Ah, the lovely Ann. Skewers them again!
17 posted on 02/18/2004 5:10:39 PM PST by Enterprise ("Do you know who I am?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Bumpus Maximus
18 posted on 02/18/2004 5:10:39 PM PST by talleyman (E=mc2 (before taxes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Excellent followup by Ann.

Boy did she nail it.

Way to expose the liars that lie.
19 posted on 02/18/2004 5:10:59 PM PST by Fun Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chiller
Is it a big wonder why Cleland wasn't quoted somewhere during the past week acknowleding this to refute?

A week full of questions about both GWB, and Kerry about their military records.

20 posted on 02/18/2004 5:11:33 PM PST by perfect stranger ("Don't shoot I'm Che! I'm worth more to you alive than dead!" Che Guevara October 1967)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson