Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: looscnnn
So what, maybe he is just doing the job that other lawyers won't do. It says immigrants, not illegal immigrants, immigrants (legal included) need lawyers too. If they get busted for something, they can be kicked out of the country. What is wrong with specializing in a certain aspect of law? Would you rather have a lawyer that specialized in the situation you are in, thus knowing the best defense, or someone that does a little this and a little that? Doctors do it, why not lawyers or is it that just because they are lawyers? That being the case, sounds like you are stereotyping. But Daney would never do that!

The fact that the Bush-basher that posted this article intentionally left that out of the article is telling of the author's credibility to the Bush-basher!

I think this is the most dangerous point, this is why we need to protect the borders. Bush's plan does nothing for this.

As much as anyone else's.

Just because there are no numbers, does not mean that it is a liberal hit piece.

Yes it does! The title states that illegals have surged but there is no numbers to show that. So it's a lie and liberals lie. Or those that act like liberals lie, like I said originally.

If someone in the GOP said that something asked of people got 90% or any % of a certain responce without giving numbers, you would believe that as gospel.

That statement is immaterial. Their reason they say they came has nothing to do with a whether a surge occured over similar statistics for this time of year. And again, no surge numbers were obtained.

However, this being a lawyer, or one that specializes in immigration law, makes it a liberal hit piece. Ever think that maybe that it is true?

If it's true they would've posted some numbers.

How about you asking some border agents to see if the story is correct.

border agents = Federal union = anti-Bush = untrustworthy on this issue.

I will bet that if you ask a few, they will say that the fact is that the story is correct.

I bet they would. They want a Dem in there to give them more of our money, early retirement, etc, like Davis did in bankrupting California.

55 posted on 02/19/2004 8:44:50 AM PST by #3Fan (Kerry to POW-MIA activists: "You'll wish you were never born.". Link on my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: #3Fan
[adjust tagline]
58 posted on 02/19/2004 8:52:34 AM PST by #3Fan (Kerry to POW-MIA activists: "You'll wish you'd never been born.". Link on my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: #3Fan
"border agents = Federal union = anti-Bush = untrustworthy on this issue....I bet they would. They want a Dem in there to give them more of our money, early retirement, etc, like Davis did in bankrupting California."

Stereotyping again, ever think that just because someone is in a union (some are forced to just to work somewhere) that they do not think the same as the union. I know a lot of union members that are not dems. If wanting more money makes a person a dem, I guess that means that a most people are dems. Sorry, I don't buy any of it.
76 posted on 02/19/2004 9:15:54 AM PST by looscnnn (Tell me something, it's still "We the people", right? -- Megadeth (Peace Sells))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson