Skip to comments.
Larry Flynt Preparing Abortion Smear Against Bush
Herald Sun ^
| 2/19/04
Posted on 02/19/2004 9:28:13 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 last
To: soozla
Anyone else care to add...???
Sure.
September - Dragged a minority to death behind an SUV wearing a KKK robe manufactured overseas and then denied it.
81
posted on
02/19/2004 10:57:34 AM PST
by
Arkinsaw
To: 11th Earl of Mar
How can any self-respecting Democrat --- look about and see the folks he is standing with - and not be repulsed?
In this case, their ally is a man who made a living sticking cameras into women's vaginas!
Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton - the "spokespersons" for the Democrats most predictable and reliable voters --- are pimps and rabble rousing racists..
Michael Moore -- describing him would get me banned...
The stars of the left --- Fonda, Barney Franks, Maxine Waters, Ted Kennedy, Dasshole, BaBaRa Streisand, Peanut Breath Carter, etc,etc........ COMBINED don't cast enough light for these fools to find their way out of the dark..
The current Democrat party, and their allies have become the "Enemy Within" that our founders feared...
Semper Fi
82
posted on
02/19/2004 11:16:44 AM PST
by
river rat
(Militant Islam is a cult, flirting with extinction)
To: 11th Earl of Mar
What's sick is people would take Flint's word for something and in some circles Flint is highly regarded.
83
posted on
02/19/2004 11:25:38 AM PST
by
oyez
(And so forth.)
To: Enterprise
There is a little nuance in applying the abortion question to George W. Bush. While the pro-abortionists see nothing at all wrong with widely disseminating the doctrine of abortions for all, cheap and easy access, the fact that someone who has indicated they are not in favor of abortions, then does engage in using these services, shows conclusively that George W. Bush is clearly a HYPOCRITE.
Not that George, at any time, ever engaged the services of a legal abortionist on behalf of another, but he MIGHT have, and that is why we have to hate him so. To the irrational mind, the connection is absolutely clear.
And of all the minds out there, Larry Flynt has to rank way up there as an example of a highly irrational one.
To: 11th Earl of Mar
FLYNT?
Nobody likes this guy...this will only HELP GW.
To: alloysteel
Give me a hand here. While I am technically a registered Democrat - all the better to have fun in the primaries - I am having a hard time wrapping my brain around this.
The party that thinks that unrestricted access to abortion at any time by any age womyn is the pinnacle of modern feminism wants to say that, because he took a woman to have an abortion MANY YEARS AGO, George W. Bush is not fit to be President.
At one time in my life I found it to be nearly sport to sleep with as many women as I could. It was heinous behavior and I would never participate in such actions today. I used to drink, but I haven't been drunk in many years. I guess that if I were to run for President (God forbid) to appease Democrats I could not continue to control myself, but I would have to once again participate in immoral activities to avoid being labeled a hypocrite.
(cue Twilight Zone theme music)
87
posted on
02/19/2004 12:59:51 PM PST
by
Crusher138
(Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just, and this be our motto "In God is our trust!")
To: Stallone; 11th Earl of Mar
It's not the "falsely linking" part, it's the "photo
s" part.
-PJ
To: Crusher138
I know, it is a little tricky, especially that part about the possibility that George MAY have assisted some young woman in obtaining a (perfectly legal) abortion.
First, there is nothing but a very crude rumor that George Bush ever CONSIDERED doing such a thing. But never mind that, he MIGHT have, and the serious nature of the even very remote chance he may have been involved, immediately brands him.
Then, and this the a-HA moment, if for even an instant George could be encouraged to give up his high moral position vis-a-vis abortion in any form, why, then, he suddenly ain't such a great character, now is he? We are not questioning the accuser's moral position, only George's.
An entirely specious argument, built on air from the beginning, and with absolutely no basis in reality. But for the unsophisticated and relatively ignorant, the accusation alone is damning evidence. And this is just the kind of catchy reasoning that is engaged by that arbiter of social and civilized standards, Larry Flynt, otherwise known as Jabba the Hut.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson