Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Nichols and Yousef meet?
IntelWire ^ | February 20, 2004 | By J.M. BERGER

Posted on 02/20/2004 5:40:33 AM PST by Peach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Peach
One thing I did not see in the story, but is an important factor...

Khalid Shaikh Mohammed worked with his nephew Ramzi Yousef[who entered the United States on an Iraqi passport and had been known among the New York fundamentalists as "Rashid, the Iraqi"], now in prison for plotting the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and two others in the Philippines on a number of operations.

Source

It also must be pointed out that:

Eight years have passed since Abdul Rahman Yasin bade hasty farewell to New York and flew to Baghdad. There he initially passed the time by fielding telephone calls placed by solicitous FBI agents and finding a niche in Saddam Hussein's police state. By all appearances, Yasin has lived a quiet, secluded life there.

Bush on Oct. 10 named Yasin as one of the world's 22 Most Wanted Terrorists for his role in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. There is no doubt about Yasin's whereabouts after the 1993 outrage. The FBI agents who perfunctorily questioned Yasin in New York and were conned by his pleasant manner quickly understood their mistake in letting him go. They got his brother to telephone Yasin in Baghdad repeatedly to ask him to come back for more questioning. Guess what?

Mr. Yasin sent his regrets.

In 1998 then-FBI Director Louis Freeh said publicly that the fugitive was "hiding in his native Iraq." The Iraqi National Congress, the leading anti-Saddam movement, earlier obtained a photograph of Yasin in Baghdad and provided it to Washington. Every indication points to Yasin's not having left Iraq since then, a senior U.S. official tells me.

Source

Ties it up rather neatly, I believe...the OKC and WTC attacks were related and all roads lead back to Iraq.

21 posted on 03/03/2004 6:28:14 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
Well stated. Great links. Thanks.
22 posted on 03/03/2004 6:30:03 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Clinton had the prosecutors rush him to the gas chamber (or whatever method they used) far too quickly. Unfortunate.

If OKC was an Al-Qaida operation, what role could Bill Clinton have played?

He refused to grab bin Laden when he was offered on a silver platter.

Could Clinton's role have been to run interference and keep things screwed up and confused so that AQ operations could proceed?

He's still around today. What's he doing now?

23 posted on 03/03/2004 6:40:32 AM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sender
Perhaps someone doesn't want the facts to come out, and he too will meet a very quick, expedited death without the chance to talk.

Be careful what you wish for...

Insight Magazine
Sep 29, 2003

Senior investigators and analysts in the U.S. government have concluded that Iraq acted as a state sponsor of terrorism against Americans and logistically supported the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States - confirming news reports that until now have emerged only in bits and pieces. A senior government official responsible for investigating terrorism tells Insight that while Saddam Hussein may not have had details of the Sept. 11 attacks in advance, he "gave assistance for whatever al-Qaeda came up with." That assistance, confirmed independently, came in a variety of ways, including financial support spun out through a complex web of financial institutions in Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Italy and elsewhere. Long suspected of having terrorist ties to al-Qaeda, they now have been linked to Iraq as well.

Insiders say the failure to assign responsibility for the Sept. 11 attacks to Iraq, Afghanistan or any other nation-state is intentional. "The administration does not want the victims of Sept. 11 interfering with its foreign policy," says Peter M. Leitner, director of the Washington Center for Peace and Justice (WCPJ). Leitner says the Bush administration may be concerned that if other victims of the Sept. 11 attacks also filed lawsuits and won civil-damage awards it would reduce Iraqi resources that the administration wants to use to rebuild the country. Leitner and others say this explains Bush's reticence at this time to report the convincing evidence linking Saddam and al-Qaeda that has been collected by U.S. investigators and private organizations seeking damages. "The [Bush] administration is intentionally changing the topic," claims Leitner, and sidestepping the issue that "Iraq has been in a proxy war against the U.S. for years and has used al-Qaeda in that war against the United States."

Source

24 posted on 03/03/2004 6:43:47 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Peach
no, nichols and mysef have never met.
25 posted on 03/03/2004 6:45:58 AM PST by love n hate tattoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Bump. Thanks for posting this, Peach.
26 posted on 04/19/2004 8:29:56 AM PDT by Darnright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darnright
You are more than welcome :-)
27 posted on 04/19/2004 8:41:21 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson