Skip to comments.
British Royals Defend 'Horrible' Prince Harry
Yahoo! ^
| Fri Feb 20, 7:00 AM ET
| By Andrew Cawthorne
Posted on 02/20/2004 1:38:33 PM PST by .cnI redruM
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Spoiled Brat Syndrome rears it's ugly head. The initial article that started this spate referred to him as a "Pommie Jackaroo". I'm not sure what a jackaroo is, but Pommie will get you in a good fist fight if you use it at a truly authentic English Pub.
To: .cnI redruM
Leave Harry alone. He's a young man who tragically lost his mother. All the royals feed off the public trough. Harry and William are just doing what rich young men do. He's having fun. Good for him say I.
2
posted on
02/20/2004 1:41:54 PM PST
by
veronica
("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." GW Bush 1-20-04)
To: .cnI redruM
"Hip-hip. Cheerio. And all that sort of rot."
3
posted on
02/20/2004 1:43:46 PM PST
by
onedoug
To: .cnI redruM
Why do they hate him so much? I like him over Paris Hilton who sometimes annoys me.
4
posted on
02/20/2004 1:45:09 PM PST
by
cyborg
To: .cnI redruM
And just what exactly does the Royal Family do?
5
posted on
02/20/2004 1:45:19 PM PST
by
dfwgator
To: dfwgator
And just what exactly does the Royal Family do?I guess you didn't read the article. :)
6
posted on
02/20/2004 1:46:01 PM PST
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Just once I'd like to get by on my looks.)
To: cyborg
They hate royalty and privelege. They see the royalty as a leftover vestige of a troubled past. I'm guessing they believe that abolishing the symbolic traditions of the royalty will alter the actual substance of British society.
7
posted on
02/20/2004 1:47:17 PM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(<HACK>It's a variadic function .... (It probably makes more sense when you're stoned.)</HACK>)
To: .cnI redruM
Soon enough he will be in the Military, and they'll certainly set him straight, Prince or not.
8
posted on
02/20/2004 1:47:21 PM PST
by
theDentist
(Boston: So much Liberty, you can buy a Politician already owned by someone else.)
To: .cnI redruM
I'm guessing they believe that abolishing the symbolic traditions of the royalty will alter the actual substance of British society. Well at least they wouldn't have to pay as much in taxes to support the Royals.
9
posted on
02/20/2004 1:48:45 PM PST
by
dfwgator
To: theDentist
Quite possibly. Josh Lewsey, who played for the British RWC Championship team, was hardened by his experience at Sandhurst. Like any country with a sound military, the Brits have some individuals in their organization that Harry doesn't want to trifle with.
10
posted on
02/20/2004 1:49:05 PM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(<HACK>It's a variadic function .... (It probably makes more sense when you're stoned.)</HACK>)
To: veronica
He is a VERY distant cousin of mine. And NO, I don't claim his father as my kin. I deny deny deny that one~
11
posted on
02/20/2004 1:53:01 PM PST
by
buffyt
(We must never use the UN as a substitute for clear and resolute US policy. B. Goldwater)
To: .cnI redruM
In an extraordinary tirade against the prince, Sarler began her column on Wednesday: "That Prince Harry is a national disgrace is scarcely news. "His exploits have been making headlines for years: the drinking, the drugging, the yobbing, the waste of the costliest education in the land, the explicit disdain for the lower orders, the increasingly sexual public romps -- we've seen it all, we've heard it all."
It almost puts one in mind of another Prince Hal ...
12
posted on
02/20/2004 1:53:03 PM PST
by
Polonius
(It's called logic, it'll help you.)
To: .cnI redruM
How sad... that would be like me hating the Bush twins.
13
posted on
02/20/2004 1:58:05 PM PST
by
cyborg
To: .cnI redruM
I thought "Pommie" was a slur on Australians? Pom for "Prisoner of His Majesty". Of course I used to sail with a guy who would call all the British sounding/looking racers "Pommie Bastards".
To: dfwgator
And just what exactly does the Royal Family do? They provide a life support system for some really old DNA.
To: .cnI redruM
Must come as a bit of a relief that the Prince is "touching up" girls.
16
posted on
02/20/2004 2:27:44 PM PST
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: .cnI redruM
He's the youngest son? That means there must have been at least three sons...why have we never heard of William and Harry's other brother?
It sounds like Prince Harry has taken John Kerry as a role model.
To: .cnI redruM
"I'm not sure what a jackaroo is" A jackaroo is a cross between a Texas jack rabbit and a kangaroo. Easily distinguishable from a jackalope, the latter having antlers, being a cross between a Texas jack rabbit and a pronghorn antelope.
18
posted on
02/20/2004 8:10:13 PM PST
by
Bedford Forrest
(Roger, Contact, Judy, Out. Fox One. Splash one.<I>)
To: Bedford Forrest
Thus proving that The Texas Jack Rabbit is indeed a creature of fecund ways and fertile seed. Exactly as one would expect.
19
posted on
02/21/2004 7:25:29 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(<HACK>It's a variadic function .... (It probably makes more sense when you're stoned.)</HACK>)
To: .cnI redruM
Britain's royal family rounded on a columnist on Friday who had branded Prince Harry "a national disgrace," lazing his way through a year off in Australia and Africa and touching up girls in nightclubs. He's just keeping up the family tradition. Anybody who's read about the 'royals' going back a hundred years knows this is par for the course.
20
posted on
02/21/2004 7:27:56 AM PST
by
Lizavetta
(Savage is right - extreme liberalism is a mental disorder.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson