To: knak
Considering that they are NOT blood relatives, I don't see the harm in legitimizing their three children. If they WERE blood-related, then no, they should not marry.
4 posted on
02/20/2004 4:24:03 PM PST by
EggsAckley
({....YES... I AM THE HATED......troll patrol.....(on duty).....})
To: EggsAckley
I do! I am adopted and so is my brother. I think it's sick!
5 posted on
02/20/2004 4:25:06 PM PST by
knak
(wasknaknowknid)
To: EggsAckley
Did you agree with Woody marrying his stepdaughter?
To: EggsAckley
Eggs....they grew up in the same house as brother and sister. Nope, no way.
28 posted on
02/20/2004 4:35:09 PM PST by
King Black Robe
(With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
To: EggsAckley
If they WERE blood-related, then no, they should not marry. All bets are off now.
35 posted on
02/20/2004 4:39:30 PM PST by
Howlin
(A Loyal Member of EggsAckley's Troll Patrol)
To: EggsAckley
Considering that they are NOT blood relatives, I don't see the harm in legitimizing their three children. If they WERE blood-related, then no, they should not marry. If one uses the biological argument (inbreeding), then I would agree. If one uses the social argument, then I would not agree: It is a bad thing for children growing up to be regarded by others in the home as potential sexual targets.
49 posted on
02/20/2004 4:45:32 PM PST by
lepton
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson