To: wallcrawlr
There are a lot of folks on this thread that agree with this and about as many that don't.
IMO important point most are missing, unless this kid is physically harmed (abused) then whatever he did do his daughter is none of your freaking business whatsoever.
His kid, his rules, everyone else butt the hell out. Obvious exceptions to abusive situations, which this one isn't and please no nannies need to reply to me that it was.
73 posted on
02/24/2004 11:46:10 AM PST by
American_Centurion
(Daisy-cutters trump a wiretap anytime - Nicole Gelinas)
To: American_Centurion
His kid, his rules, everyone else butt the hell out. So we're not allowed to express opinions? Thanks for clearing that up for us...
79 posted on
02/24/2004 11:48:36 AM PST by
blowfish
To: American_Centurion
"His kid, his rules, everyone else butt the hell out"
Thats pretty funny. This is a forum where people post articles and others comment on them. If people butted out we would have blank pages.
He is a steaming pile, not for discipline but for venue.
80 posted on
02/24/2004 11:49:27 AM PST by
No Blue States
(support statehood for libs)
To: American_Centurion
IMO important point most are missing, unless this kid is physically harmed (abused) then whatever he did do his daughter is none of your freaking business whatsoever.His kid, his rules, everyone else butt the hell out.
You're saying that we shouldn't be commenting on an article that is posted on FR? It's not like we're advocating going up to this guy and telling him how to raise his kid. What is the point of having a news forum if we don't discuss these types of issues? Are we "butting in" merely by expressing our opinions on a public forum?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson