Replies

"Gay marriage is an issue that should be left for the states.

I tend to agree with them (DeLay & Dreier) on this. There is just too much to be done to get an amendment in the constitution.

Question: If there is a law is being broken, why isn't it enforced? Why wasn't the mayor of San Fran arrested? You know darn well if this was about someone getting a tad too close to an abortion clinic he/her butt would be in jail, pronto. What are the enforcers afraid of? Are the gay/leftist/liberals too loud & media-backed to fight?"

This kind of naivete is why we lose. This is all happening in liberal states, where the state officeholders WON'T ENFORCE THE LAW. That's why we need a constitutional amendment. This is nasty game, politics. We can't play by the Marcus of Queensbury rules while the Rats kick us in the groin.

Mass, SF have made this a fed issue.

It sounds like these Reps. have not paid attention to this issue and now their misjudgment over the issue his sneaking up on thme.

I read here on FR that DC has a 20% homosexual pop. Could these reps have homosexual 5th columnists in their ranks?

BTW clinton WAS a lawyer in 1996 he KNEW Fed Doma would be overturned, that is why he signed it.

Thanks, you answered my questions. It's a helpless feeling when those assigned to protect the laws are busy breaking them and the citizens have no recourse. Guess that leaves some major action by the President.

So WHY are DeLary & Dreier against this then?