To: jwalsh07
Yeah. In a few years we'll have gay "marriage" in all 50 states, mandated by the federal courts. We'll have textbooks depicting smiling gay couples to our kids as role models, mandated by federal officials. We'll have restaurants being dragged into federal court because they didn't make their Valentine's day specials available to gay couples. We'll have the narrow 5-4 Supreme Court ruling upholding the Boy Scouts' rights being overturned. We'll have churches being marginalized, banned from taking part in certain faith based programs, and then hauled into federal court with a threat of their tax exemption being revoked because of their "bigoted" opposition to "gay marriage". We'll have a whole new class of new beneficiaries for various social security type programs.
But hey....we can at least say we didn't threaten states' rights by passing the Federal Marriage Amendment.
To: puroresu
If anyone has any doubt about the truth of your comment, there was a FR thread on an article that school districts were forbidding text book writers from showing white males in positions of authority. In essense no white male lawyer/doctor/judge/official pictures/drawings in children's books. OR if they do appear, a "balancing" contrary picture. IOW a depiction quota.
Homosexuals will demand 1/2 depiction quota for their 1%.
Next they will demand you children see continuous pictures of homoexuals kissing for sensitivity training. It is about recruiting children.
To: puroresu
Yeah. In a few years we'll have gay "marriage" in all 50 states, mandated by the federal courts. We'll have textbooks depicting smiling gay couples to our kids as role models, mandated by federal officials. We'll have restaurants being dragged into federal court because they didn't make their Valentine's day specials available to gay couples. We'll have the narrow 5-4 Supreme Court ruling upholding the Boy Scouts' rights being overturned. We'll have churches being marginalized, banned from taking part in certain faith based programs, and then hauled into federal court with a threat of their tax exemption being revoked because of their "bigoted" opposition to "gay marriage". We'll have a whole new class of new beneficiaries for various social security type programs. But hey....we can at least say we didn't threaten states' rights by passing the Federal Marriage Amendment.
It would be hilarious if it wasn't so damn sad.
Did you call Delays office?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson