To: dfwgator
What other means are there to prevent courts from legalizing same-sex marriages?Use Article III of the Constitution to restrict the purview of the federal courts.
5 posted on
02/24/2004 2:26:35 PM PST by
Publius
(Die Erde ist gewaltig schön, doch sicher ist sie nicht.)
To: Publius
Use Article III of the Constitution to restrict the purview of the federal courts. I don't see any bills being pushed by these Congressmen to do as you suggest. Not a bad idea, but irrelevant if no one in Congress will help pass it as a law...
To: Publius
"Use Article III of the Constitution to restrict the purview of the federal courts."
Interestingly enough, this may not work. Congress can limit the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. It is not at all clear to me as a lawyer, that congress could limit the purview of the district and appellate courts. One might argue that that should follow from the Constitution, but that is not precisely what it says.
95 posted on
02/24/2004 3:11:54 PM PST by
fqued
(GW - Go West, young man)
To: Publius
Art III is fairly straight forward CONGRESS can make EXCEPTIONS and this could easily be one of them. Why then do they NOT?
112 posted on
02/24/2004 3:22:08 PM PST by
PISANO
(Our troops...... will NOT tire...will NOT falter.....and WILL NOT FAIL!!!)
To: Publius
Exactly....I think the pay for fed judges should just be frozen...no raises for them....ever until they do what they are supposed to do....namely interpert the law, not make the law.
Art 3 section 1 says that the compensation for judges cannot be diminished...It doesnt say that they are entitled to raises. It would probably trigger a lawsuit in federal court to define a decrease in compensation, but given some clever and innovative lawyers on our side...the argument could take years.
Maybe Mark Levin would be interested in arguing for fixing fed judge pay....
137 posted on
02/24/2004 3:42:30 PM PST by
B.O. Plenty
(god, I hate politicians)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson