[JohnHuang2]

Wednesday, February 25, 2004

Quote of the Day by LadyX

[longtermmemmory]

Bump

[Bonaparte]

Savage Nation Bump!

[Robert Drobot]

See how they run.......

The SF mayor violates state law. The governator, sensing anarchy doesn't use his police powers to direct the arrest of all those violating law in SF. Rather than get his feet wet, he passes the hot potato over to the AG's office. The attorney generrat could have issued an opinion declaring the entire illegal mess - halting the madness in Sin Francisco, but doesn't. He tosses the potato to the most flagrant activist court in the world - the CA Supreme Court.

The CA AG says he wants to do something he has sat on for his entire tenure - question the constitutionality of the popular passage of a law written by citizens ( not the political slugs in the legislature ) defining marriage as a union of a man and a woman - not Jack and Jack, Jackie and Jackie, Jackie and Rover, Jack and his plastic blowup, or sister Sue and brother Sam.

But wait! There's a citizens group doing a mandamus thing before the Supremes demanding the wholesale anarchy be brought to a halt - now - a legal step the governator and the attorney generrat ran away from.

The moral to this story is wash your hands immediately if a politician touches yours - especially if he says he's favors civil unions of any kind to sodomites.

It's time to return criminal law to the books that criminalized sexual behavior contrary to the norms of a the community.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

GAY OR STRAIGHT: IT'S STILL HARASSMENT***"There are six girls pending expulsion right now," school district CEO Paul Vallas told me this week. "In some schools it does seem to be part of a pattern of bad behavior in general.

"I don't think it rises to the level of sexual assault. But we're dealing with it. "We have sent out advisories to all of the schools to clarify our policy. We're going to treat this the same as we do any inappropriate sexual behavior.

"We don't differentiate between whether it's boy/girl, girl/girl, boy/boy. We have policies in place that cover this and we are enforcing them."

Four of the six girls facing expulsion are from the Turner Middle School, at 59th Street and Baltimore Avenue, in West Philadelphia, where a group of girls who self identify as "dykes taking over" have allegedly sexually harassed other girls.

At Simon Gratz, a group called the "Lipstick Gang" has been accused of recruiting straight girls into a lesbian lifestyle. Clashes between groups of openly gay and straight girls have erupted.***

[vannrox]

[Xenalyte]

Savage wasn't quite coherent last night. He went on and on about how "gays are taking over all our institutions, and the final step will be for them to convert to heterosexuality."

He said that more than once, and damned if I know what it means.

[EdReform]

The Stamp of Normality

[EdReform]

Ping

What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)

[Lady Eileen]

bump

[american spirit]

I still think this homo marriage nonsense is just another ruse to keep our attention shifted away from the real important matters like Kobe, MJ, Martha et al . Realisticly, I think it's still a convenient issue to heighten passions and create a lot of debate while shifting the focus away from the illegals, soaring national debt, the evaporation of thousands of jobs, body bags from Iraq, etc. Sure seems likely it will keep the heat off both of our socialist parties in the coming few months.

[little jeremiah]

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Mike Savage gets it. Some people don't like his style, he's kind of sharp and so on. But he gets it.

Let me know if you want on/off this ping list. A very busy one of late.

[Tailgunner Joe]

bttt

[DMZFrank]

The marriage amendment should not be necessary. These actions by SF's mayor and the Massachutsetts judiciary are lawless and unconstitutional. We simply cannot amend the constitution every time the left decides to disregard it. We need to hold these officials accountable through impeachment, recall, nullification, interposition and arrest where necessary.

I am so seek of this endless deference to judicial tyranny.

When oh when will some elected executive officer in some state or federal capacity, in fulfilling his constitutional duty to honestly interpet the constitution (federal or state) just disregard the unconstitutional rulings of any court and dare the legislature to impeach him for it? When will some legislature impeach just ONE judge for an unconstitutional ruling?

To say that the courts have the final word on the constitutionality of a law NO MATTER WHAT THEY RULE is to say that the system of checks and balances envisioned by the founders does not exist any more.

Alan Keyes gave the best summation of this issue that I've heard yet. He said that every branch of government has a duty to honestly interpret the constitution. If the president honestly feels the courts make an unconstitutional and lawless ruling, then the president should disregard that ruling and refuse to enforce the provisions that he felt were blatantly unconstitutional. If the Congress felt the president was wrong in this decision, then it was their duty to impeach him for it. If the electorate felt that the Congress was wrong for impeaching the president or the failure to impeach him, they can remove them at the next election, as well as the president for any presidential actions that they considered wrongful.

Lest anyone consider this formula has a recipe for chaos, then I submit to you there is no chaos worse than an unchecked oligarchic Judiciary. We are not living under the rule of law when judges make law up to suit their whims has they engage in objective based adjudication.