Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CFW
'"It imposes neither criminal nor civil sanctions on any type of religious service or rite," the high court majority said.
"It does not deny to ministers the right to participate in the political affairs of the community. And it does not require students to choose between their religious beliefs and receiving a government benefit."'

I wouldn't mind if this was a consistent standard.

"Judge Moore's monument imposes neither criminal nor civil sanctions on any type of religious service or rite," the high court majority said. "It does not deny to anyone the right to participate in the political affairs of the community. And it does not require anyone to choose between their religious beliefs and receiving a government benefit."

5 posted on 02/25/2004 8:32:28 AM PST by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
I wouldn't mind if this was a consistent standard. "Judge Moore's monument imposes neither criminal nor civil sanctions on any type of religious service or rite," the high court majority said. "It does not deny to anyone the right to participate in the political affairs of the community. And it does not require anyone to choose between their religious beliefs and receiving a government benefit." EXACTLY!!!!
24 posted on 02/25/2004 9:35:54 AM PST by King Black Robe (With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson