Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Film May Harm Gibson's Career [H'wood Bigs vow revenge]
NY Times ^ | 2/26/2004 | SHARON WAXMAN

Posted on 02/25/2004 3:29:59 PM PST by SauronOfMordor

New Film May Harm Gibson's Career

By SHARON WAXMAN

Published: February 26, 2004

LOS ANGELES, Feb. 25 — Mel Gibson's provocative new film, "The Passion of the Christ," is making some of Hollywood's most prominent executives uncomfortable in ways that may damage Mr. Gibson's career.

Hollywood is a close-knit world, and friendships and social contact are critical in the making of deals and the casting of movies. Many of Hollywood's most prominent figures are also Jewish. So with a furor arising around the film, along with Mr. Gibson's reluctance to distance himself from his father, who calls the Holocaust mostly fiction, it is no surprise that Hollywood — Jewish and non-Jewish — has been talking about little else, at least when it's not talking about the Oscars.

Jeffrey Katzenberg and David Geffen, the principals of DreamWorks, have privately expressed anger over the film, said an executive close to the two men.

The chairmen of two other major studios said they would avoid working with Mr. Gibson because of "The Passion of the Christ" and the star's remarks surrounding its release.

Neither of the chairmen would speak for attribution, but as one explained: "It doesn't matter what I say. It'll matter what I do. I will do something. I won't hire him. I won't support anything he's part of. Personally that's all I can do."

The chairman said he was angry not just because of what he had read about the film and its portrayal of Jews in relation to the death of Jesus, but because of Mr. Gibson's remarks defending his father, Hutton Gibson. Last week in a radio interview the elder Mr. Gibson repeated his contention that the Holocaust was "all — maybe not all fiction — but most of it is." Asked about his father's Holocaust denial in an interview with Diane Sawyer on ABC, the movie star told her to "leave it alone."

The other studio chairman, whose family fled European anti-Semitism before the Holocaust, was less emphatic but said, "I think I can live without him." But others said there would be no lasting backlash against Mel Gibson. "If the movie works, I don't think it will hurt him," said John Lesher, an agent with Endeavor. "People here will work with the anti-Christ if he'll put butts in seats." Mr. Lesher added, "He put his own money where his mouth is. He invested in himself."

As Mr. Lesher implied, Hollywood is also a place of businesspeople, and Mr. Gibson is a proven movie star, popular with audiences. There are few actors with that kind of bankability, no matter their personal views. Mr. Gibson is also a capable director. So some of the initial reactions to his film may fade over time.

Mr. Gibson not only directed and helped write the $30 million film, but he also paid for it, including production and marketing costs, out of his own pocket, which Hollywood has filled.

As an actor and successful director, from "Mad Max" (1979) through "Lethal Weapon" (1987) and its sequels to the Oscar-winning "Braveheart" (1995), Mr. Gibson has long been a Hollywood pet. But he has also been known as a prankster and a self-confessed abuser of various substances. Many in the relentlessly secular movie industry see his recent religious conversion — he practices a traditionalist version of Roman Catholicism — as another form of addiction.

Last Friday the media billionaire Haim Saban, former owner of the Fox Family Channel, sent a concerned e-mail message to friends about Mr. Gibson and his father.

The message forwarded an article by the journalist Mitch Albom calling on Mr. Gibson to repudiate his father's denial of the Holocaust. Mr. Saban sent the article to, among others, Roger Ailes, who heads Fox News; Norman Pattiz, who runs the Westwood One radio network; and Michael R. Milken, the securities felon turned philanthropist.

Amid the daily dealings of Hollywood, the film and the star have been fodder for unfavorable gossip. Dustin Hoffman has talked to friends about what he called Mr. Gibson's "strangeness" during the ABC interview. The producer Mike Medavoy said Mr. Gibson's religious zealotry made him feel uncomfortable. Mr. Hoffman is Jewish; Mr. Medavoy is the child of Holocaust survivors.

"One question is, `What propelled him to make the movie about the passion of Christ?' " Mr. Medavoy said. "It makes me a little squeamish. What makes me squeamish about religion in general is that people think they have the answer: `I think my God is the right God.' How do you argue against that?"




TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: censorship; christ; gibson; hollywood; mediabias; mel; passion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-279 next last
To: atomicpossum
This is the city that will honor Leni Reifenstahl in the Oscar ceremony this year?
 
Leni Riefenstahl, Filmmaker and Nazi Propagandist, Dies at 101
 
Hollywood crucifies Mel Gibson...yet glorifies this woman..
 
The Federal Republic's version has been denazified.
Her greatest success she made with the documentary film »Triumph des Willens« named after the Reich Party Congress 1934 in Nuremberg which got the highest awards: The gold medal in Venice in 1935 and the gold medal at the World Exhibition in Paris in 1937. However, at the end of the war this film destroyed Leni Riefenstahl's career, for now it had no longer been recognized as a piece of art but been condemned as a National Socialist propaganda film. Her world-famous film about the Olympic games made the same experience. That film included two parts, part I »Fest der Völker« and part 2 »Fest der Schönheit« , and did also get the highest awards: the gold medal in Paris in 1937, the first price in Venice as the world's best film in 1938, the Olympic Award by the IOC in 1939, and in 1956 it had been classified as one of the world's best ten films.

161 posted on 02/25/2004 5:34:14 PM PST by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
From the book (and the movie...a line that stuck in my head)

Jesus: No man is greater than his master. If they persecute me, they will persecute you...


162 posted on 02/25/2004 5:36:19 PM PST by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
didn't know anything about him till the other day....
163 posted on 02/25/2004 5:38:43 PM PST by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Is this the same Hollywood that has Scientologists spouting off every chance they get? The same one with all the liberals raving against censorship; where Richard Gere praises the Dalai Lama, everyone is proud of their latest hot 'cult' and the rest wear their atheism like a badge?
It's not about RELIGION- it's about CHRISTIANITY.
God works in mysterious ways- Mel Gibson is the latest.
164 posted on 02/25/2004 5:45:04 PM PST by ClearBlueSky (Whenever someone says it's not about Islam...it's about Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
love your ping list :) How is this HURTING him? These SLIMERS are just angry to discover masses of christians, jews, YES EVEN MUSLIMS,etc. are going to watch a film about Christ. A film about Christ as opposed to filthy, dirty nasty vulgarity on film.
165 posted on 02/25/2004 5:45:29 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
God willing, Mel will one day be in Lucas's financial bracket.

Well, that might be next Tuesday.

166 posted on 02/25/2004 5:50:45 PM PST by bootless (Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Excuse me, but I notice you on every thread about this movie making sarcastic comments. Could youplease explain your motivation?

None whatsoever, and my comments are as sarcastic as your screen name. No, they're just sober, in face of the feverish entertainment fanatics treating a silly movie as if it was a Catholic High Mass. Nothing more than that, and no harm intended!

167 posted on 02/25/2004 5:51:11 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine
Thanks for posting. I'd not heard of this before. If I were of the Jewish faith, I would be calling for heads to roll on this one.

I don't watch the Oscars anyway, I swore off award shows after seeing them become nothing more than platforms for liberals to spew their garbage, ad naseum.

168 posted on 02/25/2004 5:51:34 PM PST by LisaMalia (In Memory of Sgt. James W. Lunsford..KIA 11-29-69 Binh Dinh S. Vietnam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
SHARON WAXMAN

Hmmmm?

169 posted on 02/25/2004 5:52:53 PM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Ms. Waxman,

You are an idiot.

After this film, Mel Gibson will become one of the most powerful people in town.

Deal with it.

170 posted on 02/25/2004 5:53:35 PM PST by mrobison (We are the music makers and we are the dreamers of dreams.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
It's one thing to be moved emotionally and from what I've read and heard, this is a very emotional movie. It's another to be "moved". I think most people are being affected emotionally, not in a life shattering "movement". It's one thing to commit to faith, I mean truly commit to faith. It's quite another to have had an emotional experience.

I'm with you, but remember that Noah's Flood started with a few raindrops, and none of them was willing to take the blame.

171 posted on 02/25/2004 5:53:47 PM PST by Theophilus (Save little liberals - Stop Abortion!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
So what if the Hollywood big wigs hate him now that this movie is out, they hated him before. His movies were always panned. I hope Mel tells them to stick it!
172 posted on 02/25/2004 5:55:47 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
well then...a BILLION $$$ is virtually guaranteed.
173 posted on 02/25/2004 5:56:18 PM PST by chiller (JUDGES is JOB #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Nothing more than that, and no harm intended!

I've read many of your posts. Harm is almost always intended. You bait people. The cowards way out, some would say. You think you are outrageous in some pathetic way, but most seem to ignore you, with good reason.

I just wanted to take the time to let you know I'll include you in my prayers tonight.

174 posted on 02/25/2004 5:57:06 PM PST by LisaMalia (In Memory of Sgt. James W. Lunsford..KIA 11-29-69 Binh Dinh S. Vietnam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
I haven't seen the movie yet, but I think that it is more than a silly movie.

Remember, God chooses the foolish things of this world to confound the wise.

175 posted on 02/25/2004 5:58:19 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
If soft core pornographers such as Katzenberg and Geffen actually spent some time reading the Gospels instead of spitting on them, they might even understand what Jesus was saying through Matthew and how it could well apply to Mel Gibson.

"If the house is worthy, let your peace come upon it; if not, let your peace return to you. Whoever will not receive you or listen to your words - go outside that house or town and shake the dust from your feet. Amen, I say to you, it will be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gommorah on the day of judgement than for that town."

Matthew 10: 13-15.

176 posted on 02/25/2004 6:05:30 PM PST by CFC__VRWC (AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - don't liberals just kill ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: hoyaloya
Ding Ding Ding!
We have a winner folks.
The article immediately struck me as incredibly stereotyping Hollywood as being controlled by powerfull Jewish moguls with dark intent.
Rather blatant anti-semetism from the NY Times, dont you think?
Frankly, I dont personally know very many people of the Jewish faith.The few I do know are not rich and powerfull, nor do they make a big deal of their "Jewishness" anymore than the Christians I know make a major issue of their Christianity to casual or business contacts.
Why is this NY Times writer proclaiming that Jews in Hollywood are out to punish Christian Mel Gibson for making a film about Jesus Christ?
Somehow, mainly based on lifelong osmosis,I am under the impression that observant Jews and observant Christians have much more in common with each other, than they do with persons perhaps raised in families of either faith, but who do not believe in, nor practice the actual religions of their parents.
I mean I have grandparents who were devout Christians.
That does not automatically make me a Christian, even a backsliding one.
Just because a person was born to a family who described themselves as Jewish, does not mean that person is really Jewish.If they do not believe in, or conduct themselves IAW the Jewish faith, are they still Jewish?
Substitute Christian for Jewish and Jewish for Christian in my rant, it is still valid.
Screw the NYTimes.
Secular socialists are singularly inept in commenting on matters pertaining to religious faith.

177 posted on 02/25/2004 6:06:23 PM PST by sarasmom (Vote no on all judicial retentions. Dont vote for any new judges. Impeach the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Hollywood has been blacklisting Christians for years. This is nothing new.
178 posted on 02/25/2004 6:08:14 PM PST by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
But .. because it's a blockbuster, Mel will have plenty of money to do whatever he wants.

Hollyweird is just jealous of Mel's success, and that's why they're whining.
179 posted on 02/25/2004 6:10:34 PM PST by CyberAnt (The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor; All
I'm sure that Tim Robbins, Susan Sarandon, Sean Penn, The Dixie Chicks, and other established liberal defenders of freedom of expression and speech will rush to Mel Gibson's side in a show of support. . . .


Let the double standard begin!
180 posted on 02/25/2004 6:10:59 PM PST by Tempest (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 261-279 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson