Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VOINOVICH BILL WOULD BAN RACIAL PROFILING; EDUCATING LAW ENFORCEMENT PART OF PROPOSAL
Dayton Daily News ^ | 2/26/2004 | Mei-Ling Hopgood

Posted on 02/26/2004 6:35:23 AM PST by JesseHousman

WASHINGTON | Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, introduced a bill Wednesday that would ban racial profiling by law enforcement officials, and a competing bill due to be introduced today would allow profiling victims to sue the government.

Voinovich bill would ban racial profiling The Voinovich legislation, co-sponsored with Sen. John Breaux, D-La., would prohibit federal, state and local officials from targeting individuals based solely on race, ethnicity or national origin. It would create a racial profiling awareness program that would educate state and local law enforcement leaders on the negative effect of racial profiling and a task force within the Justice Department to deal with the issue. States would have to set up a mechanism for residents to complain about profiling cases.

"This is the source of so many communities being at odds," Voinovich said. "We still have problems in Ohio in some communities — we think we don't have them.

"I think every community needs to review what they are doing in this area."

The bill provides an exemption for law enforcement to "protect the country and its people from any threat, be it foreign or domestic, including matters of homeland security, and the tracking and identification of" terrorist organizations.

Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., and Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., will introduce their own racial profiling bill today — timed almost to the three-year anniversary in which the new President Bush denounced racial profiling in a joint session of Congress — that would go even farther. Their bill would allow victims of profiling to sue law enforcement officials and require departments to collect data on profiling, both measures that many civil rights groups support. Their bill also would ban profiling based on religion.

Julie Fernandes, senior policy analyst and general counsel with the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, said the data helps departments see if they have a problem and is a good tool for discussions between the community and the police. The conference is a coalition of 180 civil and human rights groups.

Laura Murphy, director of the American Civil Liberties Union in Washington, said the explicit right to sue is a key component to fight profiling.

"For better or worse, we've been able to move police departments as a result of these important lawsuits," she said. "On balance, (Voinovich's bill) is a good forward step, but it is not as useful as the Feingold-Conyers bill."

Voinovich and Breaux said law enforcement agencies fear that collecting the data would be a burden and the data would not necessarily yield correct conclusions. They said they wanted to create a bipartisan compromise that the split Senate might stomach. The Justice Department and White House have not taken a position on the bill.

"It may not go as far as some would like, and it may go too far for others," Breaux said. But, he said, theirs is the "one that can pass."

Civil rights groups hope that both bills will help renew the momentum toward making racial profiling illegal. Three years ago, Bush and Attorney General John Ashcroft both were publicly denouncing the act. Conyers and Feingold had introduced legislation to ban it and Voinovich and Sen. Mike DeWine, R-Ohio, introduced a bill that established an educational awareness program. However, efforts stalled after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.

"We're very happy to see this as a critical issue and it is a critical issue right now in this post-9/11 context," Fernandes said. "I think mostly, we're encouraged."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: moderate; racialprofiling; rino; simpleton; voinovich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
...a competing bill due to be introduced today would allow profiling victims to sue the government.

This RINO is a boil on the arse of progress that is in dire need of lancing!

The "War on Terror" is a joke!

1 posted on 02/26/2004 6:35:24 AM PST by JesseHousman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio

Two words come to mind: Stupid and ignorant.

2 posted on 02/26/2004 6:39:18 AM PST by grobdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
I haven't been impressed with Ohio politicians in the last few years.
3 posted on 02/26/2004 6:40:24 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
And he is the "better" of our two Republican Senators.
4 posted on 02/26/2004 6:40:31 AM PST by Corporate Law (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
Senator Voinovich:

Your bill banning racial profiling and educating law enforcement officers is counter productive to the absurd degree!

Don't you have anything constructive to do with your time than to dream up ridiculous legislation such as this to thwart the war against terrorists?

It's senators like you that make Republicans like us ashamed of you Republicans In Name Only. (RINOs) Additionally, you're part of the reason we never contribute to the National Party!

Stop doing the work of the left.
5 posted on 02/26/2004 6:48:38 AM PST by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
All this bill is going to do is increase the number of racial profiling suits against law enforcement officers. In defense, they will avoid getting sued by not doing their jobs as law enforcement officers. Many suspicious characters will be given a pass to avoid accusations of racial profiling. The alternative is equally as stupid. Stop everyone and perform unnecessarily intrusions into the lives of people who are doing nothing suspicious at all...to provide the appearance of being "even handed". We can't afford the latter solution. It is stupid. The former approach means higher crime as suspects get a pass.
6 posted on 02/26/2004 6:51:26 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
If this bill would apply to law enforcement, I assume it would apply to all members of a given law enforcement agency. If this is the case, it would apply to those law enforcement officers who were involved in hiring new cops. Wouldn't this anti profiling law make it illegal to profile (affirmative action) candidates?
7 posted on 02/26/2004 6:52:41 AM PST by Blue Screen of Death (,/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76
Go Mitch!
9 posted on 02/26/2004 7:01:25 AM PST by Deadeye Division
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
Well, I guess this would institutionalize the strip searching of blue-eyed blondes from the midwest, American blacks, Japanese tourists, and Navajo Indians in an attempt to foil Arabic Islamic terrorism.

Voinovich is really a brilliant guy. Maybe Bush should replace Mineta with Voinovich - a real genius.
10 posted on 02/26/2004 7:06:48 AM PST by ZULU (GOD BLESS SENATOR McCARTHY!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
Mitchel has my support.
11 posted on 02/26/2004 7:09:18 AM PST by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: JesseHousman
Ugh. What an embarrassment for conservative Ohioans like myself, and what a nightmare this will be for law enforcement if it passes.

Now if a woman calls the police and says that a black man robbed her on Dempsey Road, the police will catch heck for "profiling" if they stop a black guy on dempsey road! God...

I'm not familiar with the term RINO, but I'm sure it applies.
15 posted on 02/26/2004 7:12:27 AM PST by Dan Middleton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
What does this mean? Will stops, arrests, indictment, and prosecution be equally divided among the races? Sigh....So much for an equal protection clause in our Constitution.
16 posted on 02/26/2004 7:20:43 AM PST by XHogPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
what is it with ohio?? they seem to have nothing but kooks??
17 posted on 02/26/2004 7:46:56 AM PST by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
The Bill would prohibit federal, state and local officials from targeting individuals based solely on race, ethnicity or national origin.

Federal Immigration Officers and US Border Patrol Agents must base their enforcement actions solely on national origin. How in the hell can you enforce immigration law if you can’t question people based on their (other than US) national origin?

Bills like this are an example of why the US senate should be subject to mandatory drug testing.

18 posted on 02/26/2004 7:48:58 AM PST by usurper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JesseHousman
Is this guy that stupid? Racial profiling to black drivers means "Now, I can really do what I want because they can't stop me or I'll scream 'racial profiling.'" They are caught/stopped more often because they violate the law more often!

Ah, say the black racist thugs and their white liberal running dogs, that can't be, they must violate the law at about the same rate? These same thugs will tell you next month when 64 colleges play basketball teams where 3 to 5 players on every squad are black, that it is a variance from normal population distribution because blacks are different than whites when it comes to basketball.

19 posted on 02/26/2004 8:07:06 AM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
I haven't been impressed with Ohio politicians in the last few years.

With the exception of my Congressman (Bob Ney) the major Ohio Republicans are all tax -sucking RINOS, including Taft, Voinovich and what's his name? Oh yeah, De Plane! er, DeWine.

20 posted on 02/26/2004 8:19:42 AM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson