SOURCE?!?!?!?!?
Especially considering one of your first posts said the following: "who issued the SEARCH WARRANT and subsequent seizure and sequestration of the records pending Rushes appeal."
Here's a hint, I post something from a respected lawyer that says the lawful subpoena process was circumvented, you responding back basically saying "WERE SO", is not a valid argument.
Any other minor logical problems above your pay grade that I can straighten out for you? No? OK.