Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: el_texicano
Key parts:

3) Because the state is imposing the permit fee on a statewide basis, the taxpayers have standing to challenge the act statewide.
(4) Under the Hancock amendment, a case is not ripe (sufficiently developed to allow a court to determine the facts, to resolve a presently existing conflict and to grant specific and conclusive relief) without specific proof of new or increased duties and increased expenses. These elements cannot be established by common sense or speculation and conjecture. Here, specific evidence as to the added duties and added expenses the concealed-carry act will impose was provided only with regard to four counties -- Camden, Cape Girardeau, Greene and Jackson. Accordingly, the Hancock challenge is ripe as to those four counties.

13 posted on 02/26/2004 10:53:42 AM PST by TroutStalker (Whip me, strip me, tie me, fly me -- catch & release)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: TroutStalker
Interesting stuff: Sounds like the legislature clearly screwed up in not providing funding for the various activities (background checks, fingerprinting, etc.) required under the act, but the law prohibits local governments from enacting new fees to pay these expenses without voter approval.
16 posted on 02/26/2004 11:06:25 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson