Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TroutStalker
Heard that too. But there was something else associated with it about 4 counties where it couldn't be enforced in. Couldn't make out what they were talking about..

Any more info????

4 posted on 02/26/2004 10:28:19 AM PST by el_texicano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: el_texicano
Apparently it is the unfunded mandate portion of the law that was challenged by the four counties, and it can't be enforced there. Sounds like rural areas are a go, while urban areas can't be forced to issue. Once they find out they can make money on it, they will eventually give in.
6 posted on 02/26/2004 10:34:04 AM PST by TroutStalker (Whip me, strip me, tie me, fly me -- catch & release)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: el_texicano
But there was something else associated with it about 4 counties where it couldn't be enforced in.

Probably the four counties where the referendum on the issue failed a couple of years ago: St. Louis City (which is also a County), St. Louis County, and whichever counties encompass Kansas City.

Basically, all the blacks voted against it because the St. Louis/Kansas City socialist newspapers manufactured large quantities of fear-mongering FUD just before the election.

7 posted on 02/26/2004 10:35:04 AM PST by Reelect President Dubya (Drug prohibition laws help support terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson