[68 grunt]

Why don't they move to west virginny?

[Mamzelle]

I don't see why this isn't a protected "lifestyle" choice.

[Lizavetta]

In light of recent developments in San Francisco, isn't it discrimination and a violation of civil rights to bar two adults from consensual activities?

After all, once you've opened the door to one kind of deviation you have no grounds to close it to other kinds.

Right?

[DM1]

They should think about moving to Mass the way it is going that will be legal in Mass soon as well ;)

[Protagoras]

Whats the problem?

[Knute]

Sarcasm hat How DARE we judge the actions of two people who love (lust) each other. They aren't hurting anyone... Hat This is exactly where we are heading if the insanity in Massachusetts and California continues! Every perversion within the capabnility of man, coming soon to a neighborhood near YOU!

[Snuffington]

I want to see any advocate of gay marriage explain the grounds for arguing against this while permitting homosexual marriage. We're talking about consenting adults here.

[JustPlainJoe]

I can't wait to show this one to Uncle Dad!

[cynicom]

Who is the law to determine who gets married or not married??? Watch the judges squirm on this one.

[SquirrelKing]

Dang!

[reed_inthe_wind]

His only crime is that he can't afford a residence in San Francisco.

[moonman]

"The judge said the state had not proved its case against Alice Ferdinandsen and ruled she had not violated her probation."

Why not prove it same way they did with the father? geeez!

[nathanbedford]

So a state legislature which chooses to prohibit sodomy committed in private violates the constitution. Likewise a legislature which undertakes to protect the unborn from abortion.

Since Roe v. Wade the Supreme Court has embarked us all on a path of jurisprudence which has virtually nothing to do with the constitution but everything to do with public relations. So, establish your cause, ie sodomy, as the flovor of the week and you get constitutional protection. Fail to do so, ie protection of the unborn or incest, and you go to jail. The supremes get to decide what is the flavor of the week - not your elected representatives.

I think the Utah supremes ought to up the ante in this circus and legalize polygamy, which is still practiced, and watch the federal supremes flip... I mean distinguish this flavor of the week.

The full faith and credit clause has more than one application.

[lilylangtree]

Sickos! Civil queer marriages and now civil incest marriages. Yuck!

[Servant of the 9]

Maybe the "Defense of Marriage Ammendment" had best limit marriage to a man and a woman not otherwise related. At present, it wouldn't prevent Mass from legalizing this kind of thing.

SO9

[hgro]

I'll bet they are bill clinton dimocrats.

[PBRSTREETGANG]

People are so judgmental. How can they prevent this poor man from marrying a woman who reminds him so much of his first wife?

[Ben Chad]

Kiss Daddy Goodnight - Louise Armstrong

[mhking]

"...You got a purty mouth..."

Just damn.

If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...

[Montfort]

I think the conviction must be overturned because the Supreme Court has carved out a zone of privacy around all sexual activity involving only adults.