Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chance33_98
These "marriage licenses" do not violate the law, since the "marriage" of the individuals named on the "license" is void, both in the natural law and by the state law which gives it voice.

It will violate the law to treat two men or two women who have gone through a sham ceremony as if they were married, which is of course impossible.

The licenses, per se, are meaningless.

8 posted on 02/27/2004 9:07:44 AM PST by Jim Noble (Now you go feed those hogs before they worry themselves into anemia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble
Don't know why anyone can claim discrimination. Anyone -- heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual -- has the exact same rights to marry a person of the opposite sex.

There is no discrimination. Period.

I wish someone would point out to the ignorant talking heads that Utah was not allowed to join the Union until it renounced and prohibited bigamy. Perhaps some Mormons would now like to re-apply for multiple wives.
14 posted on 02/27/2004 12:32:12 PM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson