[AgThorn]

I'm no fan of Hitlery, but what she says (you have in red) is accurate. If the religous islamists take control of the elections, Iraqi womens rights may be less than what they had under Sadam which would be a sad testimony for our 'investment' over there.

[MJY1288]

In the late 1700's and all through the 1800's Women in this country had very little say if any at all.

What needs to happen is that, a Constitution needs to be written that is grounded in basic human rights and law, a Constitution that clearly explains the need for a separation of powers that are equally divided between Justice, Judiciary and Executive branches and let them set their own course. Help them with elections and the frame work that will allow them to take control and govern themselves

[cyncooper]

I'm no fan of Hitlery, but what she says (you have in red) is accurate. If the religous islamists take control of the elections, Iraqi womens rights may be less than what they had under Sadam which would be a sad testimony for our 'investment' over there.

Well, it's a good thing the Bush administration already is aware of that, no thanks to the likes of Hillary. They're dealing with it without her interference. More like trying to hitch her wagon to the policy so she can claim some kind of credit for the newly formed government and claim she helped influence the administration in the right direction.

And let's not be coy, she does say they had rights under Saddam, as long as they stayed out of his way.

Ludicrous.