Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shane
"What I am trying to convey is, yes, he avoids the lower rate Medicare tax (2.754%) but pays a much higher marginal income tax rate on his income."

What is it about my previous statement that you don't understand? Let me repeat, his marginal tax rate on both ordinary income and Schedule E income are identical. If they were not, why in the world do you think he is doing this? The pure pleasure of paying more tax?

30 posted on 03/01/2004 9:00:17 AM PST by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: moneyrunner
Let me repeat, his marginal tax rate on both ordinary income and Schedule E income are identical. If they were not, why in the world do you think he is doing this?

I don't know about the tax treatment... it has been too long since I studied tax law. I can, however, suggest another reason "why in the world" Edwards would set up his practice as a corporation. It's a liability issue; for example, if he is sued for malpractice, then it can (I think) protect some of his personal assets. There is, of course, something called "piercing the corporate veil" to get at personal assets, but it can be an uphill battle as I understand it. Oftentimes a corporation is set up for liability issues as much as tax ones.

31 posted on 03/01/2004 9:27:29 AM PST by GraceCoolidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson